This study investigated the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren and modulators of P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Aliskiren stimulated in vitro P-glycoprotein ATPase activity in recombinant baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells with high affinity (K(m) 2.1 micromol/L) and was transported by organic anion-transporting peptide OATP2B1-expressing HEK293 cells with moderate affinity (K(m) 72 micromol/L). Three open-label, multiple-dose studies in healthy subjects investigated the pharmacokinetic interactions between aliskiren 300 mg and digoxin 0.25 mg (n = 22), atorvastatin 80 mg (n = 21), or ketoconazole 200 mg bid (n = 21). Coadministration with aliskiren resulted in changes of <30% in AUC(tau) and C(max,ss) of digoxin, atorvastatin, o-hydroxy-atorvastatin, and rho-hydroxy-atorvastatin, indicating no clinically significant interaction with P-glycoprotein or CYP3A4 substrates. Aliskiren AUC(tau) was significantly increased by coadministration with atorvastatin (by 47%, P < .001) or ketoconazole (by 76%, P < .001) through mechanisms most likely involving transporters such as P-glycoprotein and organic anion-transporting peptide and possibly through metabolic pathways such as CYP3A4 in the gut wall. These results indicate that aliskiren is a substrate for but not an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein. On the basis of the small changes in exposure to digoxin and atorvastatin and the <2-fold increase in exposure to aliskiren during coadministration with atorvastatin and ketoconazole, the authors conclude that the potential for clinically relevant drug interactions between aliskiren and these substrates and/or inhibitors of P-glycoprotein/CPY3A4/OATP is low.

The authors sought to quantify the influence of the CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inhibitor ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of everolimus in healthy subjects. This was a 2-period, single-sequence, crossover study in 12 healthy subjects. In period 1, subjects received the reference treatment of a single 2-mg dose of everolimus. In period 2, they received the test treatment of ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily for a total of 8 days and a single dose of everolimus coadministered on the fourth day of ketoconazole therapy. The test/reference ratio and 90% confidence interval were derived for everolimus maximum concentration and area under the curve. During ketoconazole coadministration, everolimus maximum concentration increased 3.9-fold (90% confidence interval, 3.4-4.6) from 15 +/- 4 ng/mL to 59 +/- 13 ng/mL. Everolimus area under the curve increased 15.0-fold (90% confidence interval, 13.6-16.6) from 90 +/- 23 ng*h/mL to 1324 +/- 232 ng*h/mL. Everolimus half-life was prolonged by 1.9-fold from 30 +/- 4 hours to 56 +/- 5 hours. Everolimus did not appear to alter ketoconazole predose concentrations. Given the magnitude of this drug interaction, use of ketoconazole should be avoided if possible in everolimus-treated patients.

Prospective therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus was performed in a 1-year multicenter trial in 237 de novo kidney transplant patients. Trough blood levels, rejection episodes, and safety parameters were evaluated to define an appropriate therapeutic concentration range for everolimus in this setting. Patients were randomized to everolimus starting doses of 0.75 mg bid (n = 112) or 1.5 mg bid (n = 125). Doses were then individualized based on everolimus trough blood levels (C0) in an attempt to maintain troughs > or = 3 ng/mL; no upper limit was specified. The regimen also contained corticosteroids and cyclosporine with an early dose reduction in months 2-3 posttransplant based on concentrations 2 hours postdose (C2). Cyclosporine C0 levels were also collected. Prospective therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus C0 in patients starting at 0.75 mg bid led to dose adjustments in 52% of patients to an average long-term dose of 0.93 +/- 0.36 mg bid. This gave median (10th to 90th percentile) C0 levels of 5.3 (3.4-7.9) ng/mL. In patients starting at 1.5 mg bid, 55% had dose adjustments leading to an average long-term dose of 1.24 +/- 0.35 mg bid. This yielded C0 levels of 7.2 (4.4-11.6) ng/mL. Cyclosporine dosing began on average at 274 +/- 78 mg bid, was down-titrated in months 2-3 from 181 +/- 80 mg to 81 +/- 33 mg bid, and stabilized at 70 +/- 26 mg bid thereafter. This yielded median C2 levels of 1165 ng/mL in month 1, a down-titration with levels of 853 and 630 ng/mL in months 2 and 3, and a posttitration level of 472 ng/mL. The corresponding median cyclosporine C0 was 242 ng/mL initially and 70 ng/mL in the posttitration phase. In patients starting at 0.75 mg bid everolimus and an early down-titration of cyclosporine, everolimus C0 between 3 and 8 ng/mL was an effective and safe concentration range. Concentrations up to 12 ng/mL were tolerated over the first year posttransplant. This trial demonstrated that therapeutic monitoring of everolimus can be prospectively performed for dose individualization. Maintaining everolimus troughs in the range 3 to 8 ng/mL in the first posttransplant year with reduced-exposure cyclosporine is associated with good efficacy and safety profiles.

Aliskiren is the first in a new class of orally active, direct renin inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension. This open-label, nonrandomized, single-center, parallel-group study compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single 300-mg oral dose of aliskiren in patients with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment to that in healthy subjects. When pooled across subgroups, there were no significant differences between patients with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects in aliskiren AUC(0-infinity) (ratio of geometric means, 1.12; 90% confidence interval, 0.85, 1.48) or Cmax (mean ratio, 1.19; 90% confidence interval, 0.84, 1.68), and there was no correlation between severity of hepatic impairment and either AUC(0-infinity) or Cmax. Aliskiren was well tolerated by healthy subjects and patients with hepatic impairment. In conclusion, hepatic impairment has no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of aliskiren following single-dose administration, and dosage adjustment is unlikely to be needed in patients with liver disease.

Exposure to aliskiren is increased by renal impairment but does not correlate with the severity of renal impairment (CL(CR)). This is consistent with previous data indicating that renal clearance of aliskiren represents only a small fraction of total clearance. Initial dose adjustment of aliskiren is unlikely to be required in patients with renal impairment.