In primary care, our local pediatricians still perform white blood cell (WBC) count obtained by manual microscopy. The goal of this study was to compare microscopic WBC count and HemoCue WBC System point-of-care device in reliability and clinical use. We found a slope of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.14) and an intercept of 0.12 (95% CI, −2.21 to 1.61) for the comparison of ADVIA 2120i and HemoCue WBC system (n = 14), a slope of 1.09 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.26) and an intercept of −1.08 (95% CI, −2.46 to 0.07) for the comparison of ADVIA 2120i and microscopic WBC count (n = 52), and a slope of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.14) and an intercept of −0.50 (95% CI, −1.51 to 0.34) for the comparison of microscopic WBC count and HemoCue system (n = 40). We can conclude that microscopic WBC count is still a reliable alternative for obtaining the WBC count in primary care practices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.