Please be advised that this information was generated on 2018-05-12 and may be subject to change.'De vraag is deze: waarom is een akademisch neerlandicus zulk een heel ander mens dan een nederlands letterkundige?'
AbstractThe interrelation of public and academic literary criticism often leads to controversy within the literary field, especially when writers obtain an academic position. As Jo Tollebeek showed in Mannen van karakter (2011) and Nico Laan in Het belang van smaak (1996), the competition between the academic and public discourse on literature is inherent to the history of literary studies. What are the criteria for distinguishing public and academic criticism?This question is examined for the period 1925-1935 by taking the professorship of the poet and critic Albert Verwey (1865-1937) as a case study. Verwey legitimated his academic position by referring to Shelley and the concept of 'imagination' as a special source of knowledge. By doing so he presented an artistic and philosophical argument for appointing a poet as a professor of literature. Additionally, ten years later, Verwey revealed that he accepted the position in order to change the way literature was represented by traditional historiography. How did the activities of the poet, critic and academic relate to each other? How did Verwey position himself within, or in between, the academic and the public discourse on literature? And why does Verweys positioning problematize the relation between academic and nonacademic literary criticism?
Literatuur geniet grote publieke belangstelling, zoals blijkt uit de populariteit van leesclubs en poëziewedstrijden en de levendige debatten over het literatuuronderwijs. Tegelijkertijd verkeren de disciplines die zich specialiseren in de analyse van literatuur in zwaar weer. Deze situatie noopt tot disciplinaire zelfrefl ectie: welke nieuwe mogelijkheden schetsen enkele recente Engelstalig e studies voor de literatuurwetenschap en welke wegen openen zij voor de academische literatuurstudie in Nederland?
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.