c High-risk human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) is the primary causative agent of cervical cancer and therefore is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cellular transformation is mediated directly by the expression of viral oncogenes, the least characterized of which, E5, subverts cellular proliferation and immune recognition processes. Despite a growing catalogue of E5-specific host interactions, little is understood regarding the molecular basis of its function. Here we describe a novel function for HPV16 E5 as an oligomeric channel-forming protein, placing it within the virus-encoded "viroporin" family. The development of a novel recombinant E5 expression system showed that E5 formed oligomeric assemblies of a defined luminal diameter and stoichiometry in membranous environments and that such channels mediated fluorescent dye release from liposomes. Hexameric E5 channel stoichiometry was suggested by native PAGE studies. In lieu of high-resolution structural information, established de novo molecular modeling and design methods permitted the development of the first specific smallmolecule E5 inhibitor, capable of both abrogating channel activity in vitro and reducing E5-mediated effects on cell signaling pathways. The identification of channel activity should enhance the future understanding of the physiological function of E5 and could represent an important target for antiviral intervention.H uman papillomaviruses (HPVs) are small, double-stranded DNA viruses that infect squamous epithelial cells and produce a range of clinical lesions, including common warts, genital warts, and cancers of the anogenital tract and oropharynx. A subset of HPVs are carcinogenic, and among these high-risk types, HPV16 is detected in approximately 60% of all cervical cancer cases worldwide (4). The virus encodes three oncoproteins: E5, E6, and E7. The roles of E6 and E7 in cervical carcinogenesis have been extensively studied, and the contributions of both proteins to HPV pathogenesis are well accepted. The least characterized of the three oncoproteins is the highly hydrophobic, 83-amino-acid E5 protein, which associates with internal membranes, most notably those of the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and perinuclear region (24). HPV16 E5 is classified as an oncoprotein due to its ability to induce anchorage-independent growth in murine fibroblasts and human keratinocytes (34). Transgenic mouse model systems demonstrate that high levels of E5 expression in the skin induce epithelial hyperproliferation, resulting in spontaneous tumor formation (15, 30). These mice also display increased dysplastic disease in the cervical epithelium (29). E5 mRNA is highly abundant in HPV lesions (37), and the protein is expressed in the early stages of malignant transformation, where the episomal viral genome is present (2). Therefore, E5 represents a target for early-stage intervention, prior to the progression of premalignant lesions to cervical cancer.E5 hyperactivates ligand-dependent epidermal growth fact...

Deregulation of proliferation and differentiation-dependent signalling pathways is a hallmark of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Although the manipulation of these pathways by E6 and E7 has been extensively studied, controversies surround the role of the E5 oncoprotein during a productive virus life cycle. By integrating primary keratinocytes harbouring wild type or E5 knockout HPV18 genomes with pharmacological and gain/loss of function models, this study aimed to provide molecular information about the role of E5 in epithelial proliferation and differentiation. We show that E5 contributes to cell cycle progression and unscheduled host DNA synthesis in differentiating keratinocytes. E5 function correlates with increased EGFR activation in differentiating cells and blockade of this pathway impairs differentiation-dependent cell cycle progression of HPV18 containing cells. Our findings provide a functional requirement of enhanced EGFR signalling for suprabasal cellular DNA synthesis during the virus life cycle. They also reveal an unrecognised contribution of E5 towards the impaired keratinocyte differentiation observed during a productive HPV infection. E5 suppresses a signalling axis consisting of the keratinocyte growth factor receptor (KGFR) pathway. Inhibition of this pathway compensates for the loss of E5 in knockout cells and re-instates the delay in differentiation. The negative regulation of KGFR involves suppression by the EGFR pathway. Thus our data reveal an unappreciated role for E5-mediated EGFR signalling in orchestrating the balance between proliferation and differentiation in suprabasal cells.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly aggressive skin cancer with a high metastatic potential. The majority of MCC cases are caused by the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), through expression of the virus-encoded tumour antigens. Whilst mechanisms attributing tumour antigen expression to transformation are being uncovered, little is known of the mechanisms by which MCPyV persists in the host. We previously identified the MCPyV small T antigen (tAg) as a novel inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) signalling and a modulator of the host anti-viral response. Here we demonstrate that regulation of NF-kB activation involves a previously undocumented interaction between tAg and regulatory sub-unit 1 of protein phosphatase 4 (PP4R1). Formation of a complex with PP4R1 and PP4c is required to bridge MCPyV tAg to the NEMO adaptor protein, allowing deactivation of the NF-kB pathway. Mutations in MCPyV tAg that fail to interact with components of this complex, or siRNA depletion of PP4R1, prevents tAg-mediated inhibition of NF-kB and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Comparison of tAg binding partners from other human polyomavirus demonstrates that interactions with NEMO and PP4R1 are unique to MCPyV. Collectively, these data identify PP4R1 as a novel target for virus subversion of the host anti-viral response.

In pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands (PASG) recurrent chromosomal rearrangements affecting either 8q12 or 12q14∼15 lead to an overexpression of the genes of the genuine transcription factor PLAG1 or the architectural transcription factor HMGA2, respectively. Both genes are also affected by recurrent chromosomal rearrangements in benign adipocytic tumors as e. g. lipomas and lipoblastomas. Herein, we observed a strong correlation between the expression of HMGA2 and PLAG1 in 14 benign and 23 malignant thyroid tumors. To address the question if PLAG1 can be activated by HMGA2, the expression of both genes was quantified in 32 uterine leiomyomas 17 of which exhibited an overexpression of HMGA2. All leiomyomas with HMGA2 overexpression also revealed an activation of PLAG1 in the absence of detectable chromosome 8 abnormalities affecting the PLAG1 locus. To further investigate if the overexpression of PLAG1 is inducible by HMGA2 alone, HMGA2 was transiently overexpressed in MCF-7 cells. An increased PLAG1 expression was observed 24 and 48 h after transfection. Likewise, stimulation of HMGA2 by FGF1 in adipose tissue-derived stem cells led to a simultaneous increase of PLAG1 mRNA. Altogether, these data suggest that HMGA2 is an upstream activator of PLAG1. Accordingly, this may explain the formation of tumors as similar as lipomas and lipoblastomas resulting from an activation of either of both genes by chromosomal rearrangements.