Mice carrying a null mutation in the Period 1 (mPer1) gene were generated using embryonic stem cell technology. Homozygous mPer1 mutants display a shorter circadian period with reduced precision and stability. Mice deficient in both mPer1 and mPer2 do not express circadian rhythms. While mPER2 regulates clock gene expression at the transcriptional level, mPER1 is dispensable for the rhythmic RNA expression of mPer1 and mPer2 and may instead regulate mPER2 at a posttranscriptional level. Studies of clock-controlled genes (CCGs) reveal a complex pattern of regulation by mPER1 and mPER2, suggesting independent controls by the two proteins over some output pathways. Genes encoding key enzymes in heme biosynthesis are under circadian control and are regulated by mPER1 and mPER2. Together, our studies show that mPER1 and mPER2 have distinct and complementary roles in the mouse clock mechanism.

Circadian rhythms are driven by endogenous biological clocks that regulate many biochemical, physiological and behavioural processes in a wide range of life forms. In mammals, there is a master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus. Three putative mammalian homologues (mPer1, mPer2 and mPer3) of the Drosophila circadian clock gene period (per) have been identified. The mPer genes share a conserved PAS domain (a dimerization domain found in Per, Arnt and Sim) and show a circadian expression pattern in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. To assess the in vivo function of mPer2, we generated and characterized a deletion mutation in the PAS domain of the mouse mPer2 gene. Here we show that mice homozygous for this mutation display a shorter circadian period followed by a loss of circadian rhythmicity in constant darkness. The mutation also diminishes the oscillating expression of both mPer1 and mPer2 in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, indicating that mPer2 may regulate mPer1 in vivo. These data provide evidence that an mPer gene functions in the circadian clock, and define mPer2 as a component of the mammalian circadian oscillator.

Expression of the human telomerase catalytic component, hTERT, in normal human somatic cells can reconstitute telomerase activity and extend their replicative lifespan. We report here that at twice the normal number of population doublings, telomerase-expressing human skin fibroblasts (BJ-hTERT) and retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPE-hTERT) retain normal growth control in response to serum deprivation, high cell density, G1 or G2 phase blockers and spindle inhibitors. In addition, we observed no cell growth in soft agar and detected no tumour formation in vivo. Thus, we find that telomerase expression in normal cells does not appear to induce changes associated with a malignant phenotype.

Chromosomal rearrangements are important resources for genetic studies. Recently, a Cre-loxP-based method to introduce defined chromosomal rearrangements (deletions, duplications, and inversions) into the mouse genome (chromosome engineering) has been established. To explore the limits of this technology systematically, we have evaluated this strategy on mouse chromosome 11. Although the efficiency of Cre-loxPmediated recombination decreases with increasing genetic distance when the two endpoints are on the same chromosome, the efficiency is not limiting even when the genetic distance is maximized. Rearrangements encompassing up to three quarters of chromosome 11 have been constructed in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. While larger deletions may lead to ES cell lethality, smaller deletions can be produced very efficiently both in ES cells and in vivo in a tissue-or cell-type-specific manner. We conclude that any chromosomal rearrangement can be made in ES cells with the Cre-loxP strategy provided that it does not affect cell viability. In vivo chromosome engineering can be potentially used to achieve somatic losses of heterozygosity in creating mouse models of human cancers.Specific chromosomal rearrangements can be engineered in mice to model human chromosomal disorders, such as those associated with deletions or duplications of chromosomal segments (for example, Smith-Magenis syndrome, Downs syndrome, and Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A) (5, 7, 10). Chromosomal rearrangements also facilitate genetic studies (2, 14). Inversion chromosomes can be used to establish balanced lethal systems to facilitate stock maintenance. Deletions can be used for mapping and in genetic screens for recessive mutations.In Drosophila melanogaster there is a wealth of chromosomal rearrangements that are widely used as genetic tools. In particular, chromosomal deletions (deficiencies) which collectively cover approximately 60 to 70% of the genome have been indispensable in mapping recessive mutations and in regionspecific mutagenesis screens. The use of deletions in mice, however, has been much more limited because of the paucity of chromosomal deletions which, until recently, were restricted to a few regions of the mouse genome flanking visible genetic markers (14). The application of the Cre-loxP recombination system over large distances in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells has made it possible to engineer specific chromosomal rearrangements in the mouse (13,17). This chromosome engineering strategy involves three manipulation steps in ES cells (see Fig. 1): (i) one loxP site is targeted to one endpoint along with the 5Ј half of an Hprt selectable marker gene (5Ј hprt); (ii) another loxP site is targeted to a second endpoint with the 3Ј half of the Hprt gene (3Ј hprt); and (iii) transient expression of Cre recombinase catalyzes loxP site-specific recombination, leading to the desired rearrangement. Reconstitution of a fulllength Hprt gene provides selection for ES cells with the recombination products in culture in HAT (hypoxanthine-amin...

Balancer chromosomes are genetic reagents that are used in Drosophila melanogaster for stock maintenance and mutagenesis screens. Despite their utility, balancer chromosomes are rarely used in mice because they are difficult to generate using conventional methods. Here we describe the engineering of a mouse balancer chromosome with the Cre-loxP recombination system. The chromosome features a 24-centiMorgan (cM) inversion between Trp53 (also known as p53) and Wnt3 on mouse chromosome 11 that is recessive lethal and dominantly marked with a K14-Agouti transgene. When allelic to a wild-type chromosome, the inversion suppresses crossing over in the inversion interval, accompanied by elevated recombination in the flanking regions. The inversion functions as a balancer chromosome because it can be used to maintain a lethal mutation in the inversion interval as a self-sustaining trans-heterozygous stock. This strategy can be used to generate similar genetic reagents throughout the mouse genome. Engineering of visibly marked inversions and deficiencies is an important step toward functional analyses of the mouse genome and will facilitate large-scale mutagenesis programs.