AbtractBackgroundThis study describes imaging features of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and correlates with overall survival (OS) and histone mutation status in the International DIPG Registry (IDIPGR).MethodsFour hundred cases submitted to the IDIPGR with a local diagnosis of DIPG and baseline MRI were evaluated by consensus review of 2 neuroradiologists; 43 cases were excluded (inadequate imaging or alternative diagnoses). Agreement between reviewers, association with histone status, and univariable and multivariable analyses relative to OS were assessed.ResultsOn univariable analysis imaging features significantly associated with worse OS included: extrapontine extension, larger size, enhancement, necrosis, diffusion restriction, and distant disease. On central review, 9.5% of patients were considered not to have DIPG. There was moderate mean agreement of MRI features between reviewers. On multivariable analysis, chemotherapy, age, and distant disease were predictors of OS. There was no difference in OS between wild-type and H3 mutated cases. The only imaging feature associated with histone status was the presence of ill-defined signal infiltrating pontine fibers.ConclusionsBaseline imaging features are assessed in the IDIPGR. There was a 9.5% discordance in DIPG diagnosis between local and central review, demonstrating need for central imaging confirmation for prospective trials. Although several imaging features were significantly associated with OS (univariable), only age and distant disease were significant on multivariable analyses. There was limited association of imaging features with histone mutation status, although numbers are small and evaluation exploratory.
Background
Disruption of cell‐cycle regulators is a potential therapeutic target for brain tumors in children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and describe toxicities related to palbociclib, a selective cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor in pediatric patients with progressive/refractory brain tumors with intact retinoblastoma protein.
Methods
Palbociclib was administered orally starting at 50 mg/m2 daily for the first 21 days of a 28‐day course. Dose escalation was according to the Rolling‐6 statistical design in less heavily (stratum I) and heavily pretreated (stratum II) patients, and MTD was determined separately for each group. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first course, and pharmacodynamic studies were conducted to evaluate relationships between drug levels and toxicities.
Results
A total of 21 patients were enrolled on stratum I and 14 patients on stratum II. The MTD for both strata was 75 mg/m2. Palbociclib absorption (mean Tmax between 4.9 and 6.6 h) and elimination (mean half‐life between 11.3 and 19.5 h) were assessed. The most common toxicity was myelosuppression. Higher palbociclib exposure was associated with grade 3/4 neutropenia and leukopenia. Dose limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia and dehydration. No patients had an objective response to palbociclib therapy.
Conclusions
Palbociclib was safely administered to children and adolescents at a dosage of 75 mg/m2 for 21 consecutive days followed by seven days of rest in both strata. Future studies will establish its optimal utilization in pediatric patients with brain tumors.
Purpose: Genomic aberrations in cell cycle and PI3K pathways are commonly observed in pediatric brain tumors. This study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/Recommended phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus and characterized single-agent ribociclib concentrations in plasma and tumor in children undergoing resection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.