BackgroundDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) allows the assessment of pulmonary perfusion, which may play a key role in the development of muco-obstructive lung disease. One problem with quantifying pulmonary perfusion is the high variability of metrics. Quantifying the extent of abnormalities using unsupervised clustering algorithms in residue function maps leads to intrinsic normalization and could reduce variability.PurposeWe investigated the reproducibility of perfusion defects in percent (QDP) in clinically stable patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Methods15 CF (29.3 ± 9.3y, FEV1%predicted = 66.6 ± 15.8%) and 20 COPD (66.5 ± 8.9y, FEV1%predicted = 42.0 ± 13.3%) patients underwent DCE-MRI twice 1 month apart. QDP, pulmonary blood flow (PBF), and pulmonary blood volume (PBV) were computed from residue function maps using an in-house quantification pipeline. A previously validated MRI perfusion score was visually assessed by an expert reader.ResultsOverall, mean QDP, PBF, and PBV did not change within 1 month, except for QDP in COPD (p < 0.05). We observed smaller limits of agreement (± 1.96 SD) related to the median for QDP (CF: ± 38%, COPD: ± 37%) compared to PBF (CF: ± 89%, COPD: ± 55%) and PBV (CF: ± 55%, COPD: ± 51%). QDP correlated moderately with the MRI perfusion score in CF (r = 0.46, p < 0.05) and COPD (r = 0.66, p < 0.001). PBF and PBV correlated poorly with the MRI perfusion score in CF (r =−0.29, p = 0.132 and r =−0.35, p = 0.067, respectively) and moderately in COPD (r =−0.57 and r =−0.57, p < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionIn patients with muco-obstructive lung diseases, QDP was more robust and showed a higher correlation with the MRI perfusion score compared to the traditionally used perfusion metrics PBF and PBV.
BackgroundIn chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) abnormal lung function is related to emphysema and airway obstruction, but their relative contribution in each GOLD-stage is not fully understood. In this study, we used quantitative computed tomography (QCT) parameters for phenotyping of emphysema and airway abnormalities, and to investigate the relative contribution of QCT emphysema and airway parameters to airflow limitation specifically in each GOLD stage.MethodsNon-contrast computed tomography (CT) of 492 patients with COPD former GOLD 0 COPD and COPD stages GOLD 1–4 were evaluated using fully automated software for quantitative CT. Total lung volume (TLV), emphysema index (EI), mean lung density (MLD), and airway wall thickness (WT), total diameter (TD), lumen area (LA), and wall percentage (WP) were calculated for the entire lung, as well as for all lung lobes separately. Results from the 3rd-8th airway generation were aggregated (WT3-8, TD3-8, LA3-8, WP3-8). All subjects underwent whole-body plethysmography (FEV1%pred, VC, RV, TLC).ResultsEI was higher with increasing GOLD stages with 1.0 ± 1.8% in GOLD 0, 4.5 ± 9.9% in GOLD 1, 19.4 ± 15.8% in GOLD 2, 32.7 ± 13.4% in GOLD 3 and 41.4 ± 10.0% in GOLD 4 subjects (p < 0.001). WP3-8 showed no essential differences between GOLD 0 and GOLD 1, tended to be higher in GOLD 2 with 52.4 ± 7.2%, and was lower in GOLD 4 with 50.6 ± 5.9% (p = 0.010 – p = 0.960). In the upper lobes WP3–8 showed no significant differences between the GOLD stages (p = 0.824), while in the lower lobes the lowest WP3-8 was found in GOLD 0/1 with 49.9 ± 6.5%, while higher values were detected in GOLD 2 with 51.9 ± 6.4% and in GOLD 3/4 with 51.0 ± 6.0% (p < 0.05). In a multilinear regression analysis, the dependent variable FEV1%pred can be predicted by a combination of both the independent variables EI (p < 0.001) and WP3–8 (p < 0.001).ConclusionQCT parameters showed a significant increase of emphysema from GOLD 0–4 COPD. Airway changes showed a different spatial pattern with higher values of relative wall thickness in the lower lobes until GOLD 2 and subsequent lower values in GOLD3/4, whereas there were no significant differences in the upper lobes. Both, EI and WP5-8 are independently correlated with lung function decline.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.