The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma challenged the trauma community to improve a 22 per cent average removal rate for retrievable inferior vena cava filters (r-IVCFs). Since 2006, we maintained a “filter registry” documenting all IVCFs placed in trauma patients. Our goal was to improve removal rates for r-IVCF. Patients receiving an IVCF before implementation of filter registry, 2003–2005, comprised the control group. Patients receiving an IVCF after implementation of filter registry, 2006–2009, comprised the study group. Data obtained included age, gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), mortality, filter inserted, placement indication, removal rates, and reasons why removal did not occur. Fisher exact test and chi square were used for nominal variables. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to define predictors of removing and not removing an IVCF. Three hundred seven patients received an IVCF, 142 preregistry and 165 post-registry. No significant difference existed between groups in age, gender, ISS, placement indication, or mortality. A significant difference existed between groups in LOS and presence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism. A total of 98.2 per cent of postregistry patients received a Günther Tulip filter and all retrievals were performed by Interventional Radiology. Retrieval rates improved, 15.5 to 31.5 per cent post registry ( P < 0.001). No differences existed in lost to follow-up (LTF) between groups. Univariate analysis identified age, IVC clot, DVT, and LTF as predictors for not removing a filter. Stepwise logistic regression revealed the filter registry independently predicts the removal of an r-IVCF. A filter registry is effective in improving rates of removal for r-IVCFs.

No abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 imposed significant strain on critical care services worldwide. The South London region experienced the largest numbers of critical care admissions in the United Kingdom with King’s College Hospital one of the busiest centres. This article outlines, using a descriptive narrative, the significant changes that occurred within King’s Critical Care as a result of the pandemic and the decisions that were taken to provide effective co-ordination and control to the expanded service, in part drawing on the military experience of two of the authors. The wider context of crisis and major incident leadership and management is also discussed contrasting different approaches used in civilian and military settings.

Patients who leave the hospital against medical advice (AMA) present a challenge and concern to health care providers. Patients may leave AMA for a variety of reasons. Nurses play a vital role in patients considering an AMA discharge. Most of all, nurses can help by not perpetuating the concepts that AMA means you leave with nothing. Nurses must ensure that patients leave with information about their injuries, possible issues of concern after discharge, medications or prescriptions for medications, and follow-up information, and always stress to patients that at any time they may return to the hospital for additional care.