This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of intravaginal diazepam in treating chronic pelvic pain and sexual dysfunction associated with high‐tone pelvic floor dysfunction. A literature search was conducted in Medline and Web of Science, including articles from the database's inception to July 2019. The search identified 126 articles, and 5 articles met study inclusion criteria: 2 observational reviews and 3 small randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating intravaginal diazepam for high‐tone pelvic floor dysfunction. The 2 observational studies identified subjective reports of improvement in sexual function for a majority of women, 96% and 71%, in each study. However, there were no statistical differences between Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain identified. One RCT found no significant changes between groups in median FSFI or VAS scores, and a second RCT found no significant changes between groups in 100‐mm VAS scores. The third RCT demonstrated that compared with placebo, treatment with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and intravaginal diazepam for women with vestibulodynia and high‐tone pelvic floor dysfunction yielded significant differences in reduction of dyspareunia (P ≤ .05), ability to relax pelvic floor muscles after contraction (P ≤.05), and current perception threshold values at a 5‐Hz stimulation related to C fibers (P < .05), but no significant changes in 10‐cm VAS scores. Intravaginal diazepam may be helpful in women with a specific diagnosis of high‐tone pelvic floor dysfunction, but more and larger studies are needed to confirm these potential effects.

Background Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a common phenomenon in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Surprisingly, the toxicity burdens of these irAEs have not been illustrated clearly. In this study, we analyzed irAEs for seven FDA-approved ICIs in cancer treatment to show the pattern of toxicity burden among cancer patients. Methods irAEs associated with seven FDA-approved ICIs, including three PD-1 inhibitors (cemiplimab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab), three PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab, avelumab and durvalumab), and one CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab), were analyzed based on data from 149,303 reported cases (from January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2022) collected from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) public dashboard. Proportions of serious irAEs and correlations with tumor type, age and sex were assessed via R package and GraphPad software. Results irAEs related to anti-PD-1 ICIs required less hospital care resources compared with anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 ICIs. Patients treated with pembrolizumab had relatively fewer serious cases. Treatment with ICIs led to the highest probability of serious irAEs in patients with lung cancer. ‘Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders’ and ‘gastrointestinal disorders’ were the two most common groups of disorders caused by the seven ICIs studied. ‘Cardiac disorders’ was the main type of disorders caused by these ICIs in cancer patients aged 65–85, while ‘reproductive system and breast disease’ was the main type of disorder in cancer patients aged 18–64. ‘Respiratory, thoracic, mediastinal diseases’ and ‘reproductive system and breast diseases’ were the main types of disorders associated with treatment with these ICIs in male and female patients, respectively. Conclusion Tissue and organ toxicities of ICIs are age and sex specific. There are risks of respiratory and urinary system toxicity in male patients and reproductive system toxicity in female patients treated with the ICIs studied. Future studies on the toxicity burden of ICIs should incorporate age and sex differences to better understand the relevance of ICI toxicity burden to human immune function to develop appropriate tumor immune and therapeutic intervention strategies.

No abstract

EGFR alterations are commonly observed in malignant gliomas (MG), especially glioblastomas, making this pathway an appealing therapeutic target. Unlike other EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), osimertinib (osi), a third-generation, irreversible EGFR-TKI commonly used to treat EGFR-mutant lung cancer, is able to effectively penetrate the blood brain barrier (BBB) and achieve therapeutic concentrations in brain tissue. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified six patients (pts) aged 46–74 years with recurrent MG and known EGFR alterations identified by next generation sequencing who received at least one dose of osi between 1/1/2018 and 5/26/2020. Patients received osi 80 mg by mouth once daily and continued treatment until disease progression, the development of unacceptable side effects, medical complications, or death. RESULTS: All patients had EGFR amplification. Other EGFR alterations identified included EGFRvIII (1 pt), deletion of introns 1–7 (3 pts) and deletion of introns 13–15 (2 pts). Four of the six patients were evaluable for response. Three patients (75.0%) had stable disease (SD) as best response and one patient (25.0%) was refractory to treatment. One patient with an EGFRvIII mutation achieved stable disease on osi and remained on treatment for 236 days. Thrombocytopenia developed in 2 patients (grade 2 (1), grade 3 (1) in patient also on concurrent bevacizumab) and 1 patient developed grade 1 diarrhea and pneumonia. Overall, this heavily pretreated patient population tolerated osi therapy and half of the patients had a best response of SD which lasted from 77 to 236 days. CONCLUSIONS: Osi has a tolerable safety profile in this heavily pretreated brain tumor population, and it may benefit selected patients with recurrent MG containing EGFR alterations. Further clinical investigations are needed, particularly in patients whose tumors express an EGFRvIII mutation, to identify which EGFR alterations may sensitize tumors to this BBB penetrant EGFR-TKI.

Introduction At Wake Forest Baptist Health, an adult tumor lysis syndrome pocket card was created in order to optimize management of tumor lysis syndrome and outline specific recommendations for the use of rasburicase. Due to the increased use of rasburicase at our institution and its cost, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the utilization of rasburicase for the management of tumor lysis syndrome in pediatric and adult patients in the inpatient and outpatient settings. Methods This was an observational, single-center, non-randomized, retrospective chart review conducted between September 2018 and August 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate the utilization of rasburicase and appropriateness for the management of tumor lysis syndrome in pediatric and adult patients based on the Wake Forest Baptist Health tumor lysis syndrome pocket card. The secondary objectives were to assess response to prophylactic and treatment doses of rasburicase and to quantify drug cost versus expense of rasburicase utilization. Results Overall, 64 patients (57 adults and 7 pediatric patients) were included in the study. Rasburicase use for tumor lysis syndrome indication adhered to the pocket card 64% of the time. Appropriate fluids and/or allopurinol were initiated in only 34% of patients. For monitoring, 80% of patients had all necessary tumor lysis syndrome laboratory values collected after rasburicase administration. All 11 patients (17%) who received rasburicase in the outpatient setting did not have follow-up labs collected. Of the patients who had tumor lysis syndrome laboratory values collected post rasburicase, 39% were appropriately timed to accurately assess efficacy of rasburicase with the median time of laboratory monitoring after rasburicase being 6.5 h. Response was observed with rasburicase 3 mg (92%), 6 mg (100%), and weight-based dosing (100%). The wholesale acquisition cost per patient was $5203 (1101–10,406). The potential cost savings of using the 3 mg dose versus the 6 mg dose for the patients who did not meet tumor lysis syndrome treatment recommendations based on the Wake Forest Baptist Health pocket card was estimated to be $36,419.46. Conclusion There are several opportunities for improvement in tumor lysis syndrome management and rasburicase utilization at our institution. This study will lead to the implementation of formal restrictions for rasburicase use and selection of rasburicase dose. Updating the rasburicase order panel to include appropriate prophylaxis and require input of uric acid level, populating pertinent tumor lysis syndrome laboratory values on the order verification screen for pharmacists to appropriately assess if rasburicase meets the institution restriction criteria, and providing education to providers on the appropriate ordering and timing of labs.