PURPOSE-To characterize the in vivo epithelial thickness profile in a population of normal eyes. METHODS-An epithelial thickness profile was measured by Artemis 1 (Ultralink LLC) very highfrequency (VHF) digital ultrasound scanning across the central 10-mm diameter of the cornea of 110 eyes of 56 patients who presented for refractive surgery assessment. The average, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and range of epithelial thickness were calculated for each point in the 10×10mm Cartesian matrix and plotted. Differences between the epithelial thickness at the corneal vertex and peripheral locations at the 3-mm radius were calculated. The location of the thinnest epithelium was found for each eye and averaged. Correlations of corneal vertex epithelial thickness with age, spherical equivalent refraction, and average keratometry were calculated. RESULTS-The mean epithelial thickness at the corneal vertex was 53.4±4.6 μm, with no statistically significant difference between right and left eyes, and no significant differences in age, spherical equivalent refraction, or keratometry. The average epithelial thickness map showed that the corneal epithelium was thicker inferiorly than superiorly (5.9 μm at the 3-mm radius, P<.001) and thicker nasally than temporally (1.3 μm at the 3-mm radius, P< 001). The location of the thinnest epithelium was displaced on average 0.33 mm temporally and 0.90 mm superiorly with reference to the corneal vertex. CONCLUSIONS-Three-dimensional thickness mapping of the corneal epithelium demonstrated that the epithelial thickness is not evenly distributed across the cornea; the epithelium was significantly thicker inferiorly than superiorly and significantly thicker nasally than temporally with a larger inferosuperior difference than nasotemporal difference. The human corneal epithelium has five to seven cell layers and an accepted central thickness of approximately 50 to 52 μm. 1 Bowman's layer, a dense collagenous layer approximately 8 to 10 μm thickness lies between the epithelium and stroma. The anterior margin of Bowman's
PURPOSE To characterize the epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness profile in a population of eyes with keratoconus. METHODS Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness profiles were measured in vivo by Artemis very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound scanning (ArcScan) across the central 6- to 10-mm diameter of the cornea on 54 keratoconic eyes. Maps of the average, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and range of epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness were plotted. The average location of the thinnest epithelium, stroma, and total cornea were found. The cross-sectional semi-meridional stromal and total corneal thickness profiles were calculated using annular averaging. The absolute stromal and total corneal thickness progressions relative to the thinnest point were calculated using annular averaging as well as for 8 semi-meridians individually. RESULTS The mean corneal vertex epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thicknesses were 45.7 ± 5.9 µm, 426.4 ± 38.5 µm and 472.2 ± 41.4 µm respectively. The average epithelial thickness profile showed an epithelial doughnut pattern characterized by localized central thinning surrounded by an annulus of thick epithelium. The thinnest epithelium, stroma, and total cornea were displaced on average by 0.48 ± 0.66 mm temporally and 0.32 ± 0.67 mm inferiorly, 0.31 ± 0.45 mm temporally and 0.54 ± 0.37 mm inferiorly, and 0.31 ± 0.43 mm temporally and 0.50 ± 0.35 mm inferiorly, respectively, with reference to the corneal vertex. The increase in semi-meridional absolute stromal and total corneal thickness progressions was greatest inferiorly and lowest temporally. CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional thickness mapping of the epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness profiles characterized thickness changes associated with keratoconus and may help in early diagnosis of keratoconus.
PURPOSE: To illustrate the hypothesis that epithelial thickness profi le maps could be used as an adjunctive tool to improve the sensitivity and specifi city of keratoconus screening by presenting a case series of examples. METHODS:The Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scanner was used to obtain epithelial thickness profi les in addition to a comprehensive ophthalmic examination to screen for keratoconus. Five case examples are presented; a normal eye, an eye with advanced keratoconus, and three cases where a diagnosis of keratoconus was uncertain based only on the ophthalmic examination.
Endokeratophakia appears to be a viable procedure for correcting hyperopia on the cornea by implantation of an extracted myopic SMILE lenticule from a donor patient. However, posterior surface changes and epithelial remodeling resulted in only 50% of the intended correction. No adverse side effects were observed following implantation of donor tissue for 1 year.
PURPOSE-To characterize the stromal thickness profile in a population of normal eyes. METHODS-Stromal thickness profile was measured in vivo byArtemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound scanning (ArcScan, Morrison, Colo) across the central 10-mm corneal diameter on 110 normal eyes. Maps of the average, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and range of stromal thickness were plotted. The average location of the thinnest stroma was found. The crosssectional hemi-meridional stromal thickness profile was calculated using annular averaging. The absolute stromal thickness progression relative to the thinnest point was calculated using annular averaging as well as for 8 hemi-heridians individually. RESULTS-The mean stromal thickness at the corneal vertex and at the thinnest point were 465.4 ±36.9 μm and 461.8±37.3 μm, respectively. The thinnest stroma was displaced on average 0.17±0.31 mm inferiorly and 0.33±0.40 mm temporally from the corneal vertex. The average absolute stromal thickness progression from the thinnest point could be described by the quadratic equation: stromal thickness = 6.411 × radius 2 + 2.444 × radius (R 2 = 0.999). Absolute stromal thickness progression was independent of stromal thickness at the thinnest point. The increase in hemi-meridional absolute stromal thickness progression was greatest superiorly and lowest temporally.CONCLUSIONS-Three-dimensional thickness mapping of the corneal stroma and stromal thickness progression in a population of normal eyes represent a normative data set, which may help in early diagnosis of corneal abnormalities such as keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration. Absolute stromal thickness progression was found to be independent of stromal thickness.The human corneal stroma represents approximately 90% of the total corneal thickness and has an accepted central thickness of approximately 478 to 500 μm. 1-3 Knowledge of the stromal thickness profile is of interest in the area of corneal refractive surgery, as changes in corneal refractive power are achieved through changes in the stromal thickness profile. Measurements of stromal thickness profile pre-and postoperatively allow stromal ablation rate to be quantified and changes in thickness profile to be determined. 4,5 Stromal thickness mapping could help further understand corneal biomechanics. Stromal thickness profiles could also be useful in identifying corneal disorders such as keratoconus; corneal thickness profile has previously been suggested for the early diagnosis of keratoconus 6 following characterization of corneal thickness progression by Mandell in 1969. 7 Different methods have been used to measure stromal thickness: optical coherence tomography, 8,9 confocal microscopy, 1-3,10 and through focusing confocal microscopy. 11,12 All studies measured the average central stromal thickness. Only two studies provided stromal thickness measurements in the peripheral cornea; however, the number of points measured was limited to one point in the temporal cornea. 1,2 NIH Public AccessVer...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.