SUMMARYIn 2002, the United Network for Organ Sharing proposed increasing the pool of donor kidneys to include Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD). Outside the USA, the ECD definition remains the one used without questioning whether such a graft allocation criterion is valid worldwide. We performed a meta-analysis to quantify the differences between ECD and Standard Criteria Donor (SCD) transplants. We paid particular attention to select studies in which the methodology was appropriate and we took into consideration the geographical area. Thirty-two publications were included. Only five studies, all from the USA, reported confounderadjusted hazard ratios comparing the survival outcomes between ECD and SCD kidney transplant recipients. These five studies confirmed that ECD recipients seemed to have poorer prognosis. From 29 studies reporting appropriate survival curves, we estimated the 5-year pooled nonadjusted survivals for ECD and SCD recipients. The relative differences between the two groups were lower in Europe than in North America, particularly for death-censored graft failure. It is of primary importance to propose appropriate studies for external validation of the ECD criteria in non-US kidney transplant recipients.
Developing prognostic markers of mortality for patients with chronic disease is important for identifying subjects at high risk of death and optimizing medical management. The usual approach in this regard is the use of time-dependent ROC curves, which are well adapted for censored data. Nevertheless, an important part of the mortality may not be due to the chronic disease, and it is often impossible to individually determine whether or not the deaths are related to the disease itself. In survival regression, one solution is to distinguish between the expected mortality of one general population (from life tables) and the excess mortality related to the disease, by using an additive relative survival model. In this paper, we propose a new estimator of time-dependent ROC curves, which includes this concept of net survival, in order to evaluate the capacity of a marker to predict disease-specific mortality. We performed simulations in order to validate this estimator. We also illustrate this method using two different applications: (i) predicting mortality related to primary biliary cirrhosis of the liver and (ii) predicting mortality related to kidney transplantation in end-stage renal disease patients. For each application, we evaluated a scoring system already established. The results demonstrate the utility of the proposed estimator of net time-dependent ROC curves.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.