A downsized version of the ReinHeart total artificial heart (TAH) was developed. Hemocompatibility needs to be revised since the operating point of the downsized TAH has changed to a higher pump frequency to accomplish the same cardiac output. A mock circulation loop was designed, containing a left side for hemocompatibility testing and a right side to mimic realistic work conditions. A protocol for hemolysis testing was established using pooled porcine blood with an operation point of 5 L/min, a mean outlet pressure of 100 mm Hg and a mean inlet pressure of 12 mm Hg. Six trials were performed testing two downsized TAH (one with a compliance chamber [CC] connected, necessary for a pneumatic decoupling of both membranes and one open to atmosphere) and a BPX-80 as reference pump. The average modified index of hemolysis and normalized index of hemolysis (NIH in mg/100L) from six individual trials of the reference pump were 0.34 (0.07) and 3.21 (0.61) and of the TAH open to atmosphere 4.18 (1.19) and 38.85 (10.59), respectively. In between TAH with and without CC, there was no significant difference. A NIH ratio of TAH and reference pump was calculated to minimize variation of the different blood batches used in individual trials. Due to the downsizing, the ReinHeart's hemolysis level increased by around 22% compared with the original size version. Comparing the results to clinically approved left ventricular assist devices, the level of hemolysis can still be considered acceptable.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The objective of this study is to identify the preload and afterload sensitivity of the ReinHeart TAH 2.0. For adequate left-right flow balance, the concept of a reduced right stroke volume (by about 10%) and active adaption of the right diastole duration are evaluated concerning the controllability of the flow balance. This study used an active mock circulation loop to test a wide range of preload and afterload conditions.Preload sensitivity was tested at atrial pressures (APs) between 4 and 20 mm Hg. Left afterload was varied in a range of 60-140 mm Hg mean aortic pressure (MAP), right afterload was simulated between 15 and 40 mm Hg. Four scenarios were developed to verify that the flow difference fully covers the defined target range of 0-1.5 L/min. Although a positive correlation between inlet pressure and flow is identified for the right pump chamber, the left pump chamber already fills completely at an inlet pressure of 8-10 mm Hg. With increasing afterload, both the left and right flow decrease.A positive flow balance (left flow exceeds right flow) is achieved over the full range of tested afterloads. At high APs, the flow difference is limited to a maximum of 0.7 L/min. The controllability of flow balance was successfully evaluated in four scenarios, revealing that a positive flow difference can be achieved over the full range of MAPs. Under physiological test conditions, the linear relationship between flow and heart rate was confirmed, ensuring good controllability of the TAH.

Background In the total artificial heart (TAH), the inputs to the physiological control unit, preload, and afterload, are detected from intrinsic pump parameters (e.g., motor current). Within this study, their detection techniques are developed, and their reliability in pre‐ and afterload prediction is mapped for a broad range of cardiovascular system states. Methods We used ReinHeart TAH which is a fully implantable TAH with a plunger coil drive that is alternately emptying the left and right chambers. From the coil currents we first derived a force generated by the piston with respect to its position and then analyzed its pattern to detect (1) preload—chamber filling, found as piston position at begin ejection and (2) afterload—mean outflow pressures, determined as linearly calibrated average piston force during ejection. TAH is then integrated into a mock loop circulation (MLC) which is set to 135 different steady operating points varying in chamber filling (0%–100%, five steps), mean outflow pressures (system circulation: 60–90–120 mm Hg, pulmonary circulation: 15–30‐45 mm Hg), and heart cycle duration (171–600 ms in seven non‐equidistant steps). The detected preload and afterload are compared to MLC set values, and the errors are mapped. Results Respectively for the left and right chambers, the preload was detectable in 134 and 118 operating points and the mean error was ±3% and ±2%. The afterload was detectable in 135 and 87 operating points and the mean error was 37% and 30% respectively for left and right circulation. The operational points that are further away from homeostatic equilibrium values generally yielded larger errors. The largest errors were observed for right circulation at long cycle duration, low afterload, and low filling. Conclusions The study yields reliable preload estimation in a broad range of physiological states, particularly for left circulation. Detection of afterload needs further improvements. The study revealed a need for piston movement optimization within the ReinHeart TAH during the early phase of systole.

No abstract