Background The purpose of our study was to determine the incidence and average cost of nerve injuries in patients presenting with upper extremity trauma. Methods The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes specific to peripheral nerve injuries of the upper extremity. Data on the incidence, patient demographics, average number of associated diagnoses, Injury Severity Scale (ISS) score, mechanism of injury, and average cost of care were collected and analyzed. Results Of 1.58 million upper extremity traumatic injuries, there were 5244 nerve injuries, resulting in an annual incidence of 16.9 per 100,000 persons with an average age of 38.42 years. Ulnar nerve injuries were the most common (3.86 per 100,000) followed by digital nerve (2.96 per 100,000), radial nerve (2.90 per 100,000), and median nerve (2.01 per 100,000). Injuries to the brachial plexus had the highest average ISS score (9.79 ± 0.71) and number of presenting diagnoses (8.85 ± 0.61) while having a lower than average emergency department (ED) cost. Patients with digital nerve injuries had the highest average ED cost ($8931.01 ± $847.03), whereas their ISS score (2.82 ± 0.19) and number of presenting diagnoses (4.92 ± 0.22) were the lowest. The most commonly reported mechanism of injury in this study population was from a laceration (29.2%) followed by blunt injury, fall (14.8%), and being struck (7.20%). Males were 2.14 (2.01–2.28) times more likely to have an injury to an upper extremity nerve and 3.25 (2.79–3.79) times more likely to injure a digital nerve. Conclusions While there was a low incidence of upper extremity nerve injuries associated with upper extremity trauma, the ulnar nerve was most frequently injured. Males were twice as likely to sustain a traumatic upper extremity nerve injury, with laceration being the most common mechanism of injury. The average ED cost associated with upper extremity nerve injuries in the United States was determined to be approximately $5779.
Background Complications after microvascular surgery, such as partial flap loss, and arterial/venous compromise cannot only increase morbidity for the patient but also tax the healthcare system. Thrombocytosis, both essential and reactive, can predispose patients to thrombosis and hemorrhage and thus should intuitively have an effect on the outcome of microvascular free tissue transfers. We sought to evaluate the effect of preoperative thrombocytosis on outcomes after microvascular free flap surgery. Methods A retrospective review of the 2013–2016 American Collges of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database identified 4,299 patients who had microsurgical flaps. Of these 3,744 had preoperative platelet levels recorded. Fifty‐four patients had preoperative thrombocytosis, defined as a platelet count >450 K/CUMM, while 3,690 did not. The groups were compared; demographics, comorbidities, and smoking status were recorded. We then examined outcomes between groups including average operative time, length of hospital stay, need for transfusion, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) postoperatively, and need for reoperation. Results When comparing the two cohorts, there was no statistical difference in comorbidities. We found a significant difference between the thrombocytosis and control cohort in need for transfusion (29.6 vs. 12.8%, p = .0002), average days till discharge (8.36 vs. 5.75, p = .009), and need for reoperation (27.8 vs. 13.8%, p = .003). There was no difference in DVT occurrence (0 vs. 0.1%, p = .46) or average operation time (535 m vs. 482 min, p = .088). Conclusion Patients with thrombocytosis undergoing microvascular free flaps are at increased risk for complications, including the need for a blood transfusion, prolonged hospital stays, and reoperation.
Background: With high success rates of autologous breast reconstruction, the focus has shifted from flap survival to improved patient outcomes. Historically, a criticism of autologous breast reconstruction has been the length of hospital stay. Our institution has progressively shortened the length of stay after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction and began discharging select patients on postoperative day 1 (POD1). The purpose of this study was to document our experience with POD1 discharges and to identify preoperative and intraoperative factors that may identify patients as candidates for earlier discharge. Methods: An institutional review board-approved, retrospective chart review of patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction from January 2019 to March 2022 at Atrium Health was completed, consisting of 510 patients and 846 DIEP flaps. Patient demographics, medical history, operative course, and postoperative complications were collected. Results: Twenty-three patients totaling 33 DIEP flaps were discharged on POD1. The POD1 group and the group of all other patients (POD2+) had no difference in age, ASA score, or comorbidities. BMI was significantly lower in the POD1 group (P = 0.039). Overall operative time was significantly lower in the POD1 group, and this remained true when differentiating into unilateral operations (P = 0.023) and bilateral operations (P = 0.01). No major complications occurred in those discharged on POD1. Conclusions: POD1 discharge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction is safe for select patients. Lower BMI and shorter operative times may be predictive in identifying patients as candidates for earlier discharge.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.