Statins represent a family of drugs that are potentially able to defend COVID-19 patients against uncontrolled systemic inflammatory response produced by the virus Sars-Cov-2. Therefore, some physicians proposed and used anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment regimen of patients with COVID-19 [1]. Statins are well known for their anti-inflammatory effects [2], and some hospitals included them in the COVID-19 treatment protocol [3]. In addition, studies in vitro verified that "there is evidence suggesting that statins exert anti-viral activity and may block the infectivity of enveloped viruses" [4]. In other words, statins could be efficient SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors of the main protease, a key coronavirus enzyme, which is a potential drug target [4]. Considering the above premises, we hypothesized that patients taking statins were better protected against mortality risk than those who do not take statins. We verified this hypothesis in a population of 71 consecutive patients with a pre-existing chronic cardiovascular disease, who become ill from COVID-19 between February 29, 2020, and May 20, 2020. The follow-up ended on June 15, 2020. The only endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± one SD or median (range) values; and categorical data as percentages. All dichotomous variables were compared utilizing the χ2 test; and continuous parameters using analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Survival probabilities were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves plotted and compared between groups using the log-rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Background The spread of percutaneous arterial catheterization in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures has led to a parallel increase of vascular access site complications. The incidence of these events is between 0.2–1%. A detailed analysis of injuries by type of procedure shows a higher incidence of injuries after therapeutic procedures (3%) than those observed for diagnostic ones (1%), due to the greater size of the vascular devices used and the necessity to frequently administer anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy during procedures. The iatrogenic arterial injuries requiring treatment are the pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, arterial rupture and dissection. Less frequent complications include distal embolization of the limbs, nerve damage, abscess and lymphocele. Moreover, the use of percutaneous vascular closure devices (VCD) has further expanded the types of complications, with an increased risk of stenosis, thrombosis, distal embolism and infection. Our work aims to bring the personal 10 years’ experience in the percutaneous treatment of vascular access-site complications. Results Ninety-two pseudoaneurysms (PSA), 12 arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), 15 retrograde dissections (RD) and 11 retroperitoneal bleedings (RB) have been selected and treated. In 120/130 cases there were no periprocedural complications with immediate technical success (92.3%). Nine femoral PSA, treated with percutaneous ultrasound-guided thrombin injection, showed a failure to close the sac and therefore they were treated by PTA balloon inflation with a contralateral approach and cross-over technique. Only one case of brachial dissection, in which the prolonged inflation of the balloon has not led to a full reimbursement of the dissection flap, was then surgically repaired. At the 7 days follow-up, complications were two abscesses in retroperitoneal bleedings, treated by percutaneous drainage. At 3 months, acute occlusion of 3 covered femoral stents occurred, then treated by loco-regional thrombolysis and PTA. A total of 18 major complications was recorded at 2 years, with a complication rate at 2 years of 13.8%. Conclusions The percutaneous treatment of vascular access-site complications is the first-choice treatment. It represents a safe and effective option, validated by a high technical success rate and a low long-term complication rate, that allows avoiding the surgical approach in most cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.