Introduction:
Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) has been shown to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes, especially ventricular arrhythmic events.
Hypothesis:
A few studies, limited by small sample size, have examined the relationship between myocardial scar and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether scar identified on LGE predicts response to CRT in cardiomyopathy.
Methods:
We searched PubMed and Embase for clinical trials reporting CRT response based on scar determined by LGE -CMR. Primary outcome was defined as improvement in NYHA class or echocardiographic parameters (not limited to but including dP/dT, radial strain and reduction of LV end systolic volume). Random effects model was used to pool the data across the studies.
Results:
After screening 1876 articles, we identified 14 clinical trials that met inclusion criteria. A total of 984 patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity across the studies (I
2
=30%, p= 0.13). Presence of scar on LGE-CMR decreased CRT response by 39% (RR: 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 - 0.71; p<0.001). Exclusion sensitivity analysis did not change the effect size. Pooled analysis of studies reporting only ischemic cardiomyopathy revealed that any myocardial scar reduced CRT response by 38% (RR: 0.62 (0.44 - 0.86; p=0.004).
Conclusions:
The presence of any myocardial scar detected by LGE predicts sub-optimal response to CRT in cardiomyopathy. This shows that identification of scar using LGE- CMR can be used as an important risk stratification tool for CRT response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.