To compare the effectiveness of intravenous acetaminophen with that of morphine in reducing pain in the first stage of labor. An open-label, randomized controlled trial of women ≥ 34 weeks gestation in the first stage of labor, assigned to either intravenous acetaminophen or morphine. The primary outcome was improved analgesia measured by difference of visual analog scale (VAS) score at 120 minutes from baseline. Secondary outcomes were request for rescue analgesia, maternal side effects, and fetal heart rate changes. Statistical analyses performed were chi-square, Student's-test, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Of 40 women randomized, 18 received acetaminophen (2 did not receive study drug), and 20 received morphine. Because of difficulties in recruitment, the sample size of 88 was not achieved. The primary outcome was similar between groups ( = 0.53). Within 120 minutes of initial treatment, more women receiving intravenous acetaminophen required rescue analgesia (acetaminophen: 52.9% vs. morphine: 17.6%, < 0.01). Maternal and fetal side effects were similar between groups. There was no difference in VAS scores between groups. However, as half of women receiving intravenous acetaminophen required rescue analgesia within 120 minutes of treatment, intravenous acetaminophen may be less effective for analgesia in early labor compared with intravenous morphine.
Standalone or combinations of the above parameters, enabled us to provide the following calculation: GCT+4*fOGTT, as the best predictor for lifestyle modifications failure. Placing the result on a ROC curve (Figure) will provide the specificity and sensitivity (AUC¼0.7419) for lifestyle modifications failure. Of note, lifestyle modifications group presented higher rates of vaginal deliveries and lower rates of maternal hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: Maternal baseline characteristics and diabetes diagnostic parameters may predict which patients will fail to achieve good glycemic control solely by lifestyle modifications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.