No abstract

No abstract

National guidelines for blood pressure (BP) measurement recommend use of the upper arm for BP cuff placement. Clinicians sometimes use the forearm location for placement of the BP cuff in patients with large arm circumferences when the correct BP cuff size for upper arm BP is not available. The purpose of this study was to determine if blood pressures obtained in the forearm or with an extra-long BP cuff in the upper arm accurately reflects BP measured in the upper arm with an appropriately sized BP cuff in patients with large upper arm circumference. A method-comparison study design was used, with each subject serving as his or her own control. In a convenience sample of PACU patients, noninvasive blood pressures were obtained in two different locations (forearm; upper arm) and in the upper arm with an extra-long adult and recommended large adult cuffs. The same arm was used for each measurement with the time between measurements based on the American Heart Association (AHA) recommendations. Data were analyzed by calculating bias and precision for the BP cuff size and location and Student's t tests, with P , .0125 considered significant. Forty-nine postanesthesia patients participated in the study. Significant differences were found between forearm and upper arm systolic (P , .0001) and diastolic (P , .0002) BP measurements. Significant differences were found between the systolic BP measured with the extra-long cuff at the upper arm site compared to the upper arm, reference standard BP (t 48df 5 5.38, P , .0001) but not for the diastolic BP (t 48df 5 4.11, P , .019). The magnitude of the discrepancies in BP measurement found with the forearm cuff location and the upper arm, extra-long cuff compared to the AHA recommended upper arm, proper-sized BP cuff could lead clinicians to incorrectly identify or miss hypotension or hypertension in PACU patients, predisposing them to serious complications. Further studies should be done in order to determine accurate blood pressure measurement in this population of patients.Femoral sheath removal followed by compression of the femoral artery after a coronary angiography for diagnostic and intervention procedures is a nursing responsibility across many hospital settings (Chlan, Sabo, Savik, 2005). Several methods exist for achieving hemostasis of the femoral artery after the discontinuation of the sheath. Nurses can use manual pressure alone, manual pressure and a compression device such as Femostop, or manual pressure and utilizing hemostasis patch such as SyvekPatch. The purpose of this quasi-experimental, randomized study was to compare the effects of two groin compression methods: manual compression and manual compression with a hemostatic patch (SyvekPatch) on patient comfort, time to hemostasis, duration of bed rest, length of stay and cost of care. There were no significant differences in pain scores between the manual and hemostatic patch groups using the Numeric Rating Pain Scale (r 5 .80). A statistical significant was found regarding pressure time between the two g...

No abstract