Low-intensity drying is widely believed to protect waterlogged archeological wood against the adverse effects of dimensional alteration and cracking. However, slow drying generates substantial costs for the conservation process. This study compares the effects on conservation of highly-degraded sapwood (SW) and slightly-degraded heartwood (HW) from waterlogged archeological Scots pine wood treated with polyethylene glycol either as a mixture of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400/4000 or PEG 2000 solution and air-dried using different approaches. The reference air-drying approach, using gradually decreasing air relative humidity (RH), i.e., 96, 86, 75, 66, and finally 44% (multi-stage schedule), was compared to an alternative approach, using constant RH of 44% (single-stage schedule). The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis confirmed the decomposition of hydrophilic chemical wood components and revealed differences in the degree of degradation of waterlogged SW and HW. The drying time of PEG-treated waterlogged wood air-dried using a one-stage schedule was shorter compared to the drying time using multi-stage drying. Multivariate analysis (ANOVA) revealed that the drying schedule used after impregnation of waterlogged wood with PEG can have a beneficial effect on wood hygroscopicity and dimensional stability. The drying schedule significantly affected the equilibrium moisture content (EMC) of SW and HW and reduced tangential (ST) shrinkage of SW. These results show the positive effect of the single-stage alternative drying approach on the dimensional stability of highly-degraded Scots pine SW impregnated with PEG 2000. In the case of slightly-degraded HW, the drying approach did not affect wood preservation. These results can be useful for the conservation of highly-degraded waterlogged Scots pine wood.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.