Melanoma is on the first place in mortality among all skin tumors. Over the past 50 years, there has been a steady increase in the incidence of cutaneous melanoma compared to other types of tumors. Rates of 5-year survival are fairly high, if melanoma is diagnosed in the early stages, which requires adequate diagnostics and treatment. Melanoma diagnostic, especially in the early stages, can be problematic even for an experienced dermatologist. However, primary contact doctor can be any specialty. Melanoma and other skin tumors can be detected by physical examination during treatment for another disease. Phenotypic risks factors, anamnestic data, and physical examination data are important in cutaneous melanoma diagnostics. The sensitivity of clinical diagnosis during a visual examination by an experienced dermatologist is approximately 70 percent. However, dermascopy can significantly increase the accuracy of a clinical diagnostics. In recent years there has been an active research for new non-invasive methods and algorithms for cutaneous melanoma diagnostics. The main goal of non-invasive diagnostics is to determine need for biopsy. This decision should be based on a combination of clinical and dermascopic examinations and other information, including growth dynamics, symptoms and medical history. Thus, an adequate diagnostic of cutaneous melanoma, including non-invasive and invasive methods, is a simple and economically viable way to early detection of cutaneous melanoma and to reduce mortality from this aggressive disease.
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and heterogeneous group of mesenchymal cell tumors, accounting for only 1% of all malignances. Every year about 3700 new cases of STS are registered in Russia, while the annual increase rate was 6.45% in 2019. Randomized studies confirm the feasibility of combination therapy for STS. The review contains a comprehensive description of the proposed methods of combined treatment of STS. Advantages, disadvantages, directions and features of various methods of radiation therapy for STS are shown on the examples of scientific research of recent years.
Preoperative radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas characterized by important advantages: high precision of dose delivery, reduction of tumour volume and implantation potential, induction of immunologic response. Postoperative radiotherapy associated with decreased complication rate, delivery of treatment to microscopic disease according to pathologic report. Combination of pre- and postoperative irradiation gives the opportunity to use best of both methods. The aim: analyses of feasibility and safety of radiotherapy protocol that combined pre- and postoperative radiotherapy in patients with soft tissues sarcomas of extremities. Materials and methods: from 06.2018 to 01.2020 ten patients with soft tissue sarcomas of extremities were included in the protocol. Preoperative stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) was performed as 5 fraction of 7 Gy on the main tumor volume with dose reduction to 5Gy in 5 fraction on the margins of the field. Postoperative radiotherapy started 5-8 weeks after surgery and was performed as standard compartmental irradiation in 25 fractions of 2Gy. Complications were determined according to CTCAE and wound complication scales. Results: from 06.2018 to 01.2020 10 patients with soft tissue sarcomas of extremities were included in the study. Pre-opeartive SABR and subsequent radical resection with tumor free surgical margins were performed in all 10 cases. Primary wound closure was mentioned in all patients. With relatively short follow-up of 9.1 (3-20) months we didn’t mentioned any case of grade II or more toxicity and no local recurrences. Conclusion: Our preliminary results demonstrate that combination of preoperative SABR and postoperative conventional radiotherapy is feasible and associated with low probability of grade II (and higher) toxicity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.