Рабочая группа Европейского кардиологического общества (ESC, ЕОК) и Европейского общества по изучению атеросклероза (EAS, ЕОА) по лечению дислипидемий Авторы/члены Рабочей группы: François Mach* (Председатель) (Швейцария), Colin Baigent* (Председатель) (Великобритания),

Even at low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal, patients with cardiometabolic abnormalities remain at high risk of cardiovascular events. This paper aims (i) to critically appraise evidence for elevated levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as cardiovascular risk factors, and (ii) to advise on therapeutic strategies for management. Current evidence supports a causal association between elevated TRL and their remnants, low HDL-C, and cardiovascular risk. This interpretation is based on mechanistic and genetic studies for TRL and remnants, together with the epidemiological data suggestive of the association for circulating triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. For HDL, epidemiological, mechanistic, and clinical intervention data are consistent with the view that low HDL-C contributes to elevated cardiovascular risk; genetic evidence is unclear however, potentially reflecting the complexity of HDL metabolism. The Panel believes that therapeutic targeting of elevated triglycerides (≥1.7 mmol/L or 150 mg/dL), a marker of TRL and their remnants, and/or low HDL-C (<1.0 mmol/L or 40 mg/dL) may provide further benefit. The first step should be lifestyle interventions together with consideration of compliance with pharmacotherapy and secondary causes of dyslipidaemia. If inadequately corrected, adding niacin or a fibrate, or intensifying LDL-C lowering therapy may be considered. Treatment decisions regarding statin combination therapy should take into account relevant safety concerns, i.e. the risk of elevation of blood glucose, uric acid or liver enzymes with niacin, and myopathy, increased serum creatinine and cholelithiasis with fibrates. These recommendations will facilitate reduction in the substantial cardiovascular risk that persists in patients with cardiometabolic abnormalities at LDL-C goal.

SummaryWe compared the effects of oral estradiol (2 mg), transdermal estradiol (50 g), and placebo on measures of coagulation, fibrinolysis, inflammation and serum lipids and lipoproteins in 27 postmenopausal women at baseline and after 2 and 12 weeks of treatment. Oral and transdermal estradiol induced similar increases in serum free estradiol concentrations. Oral therapy increased the plasma concentrations of factor VII antigen (FVIIag) and activated factor VII (FVIIa), and the plasma concentration of the prothrombin activation marker prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2). Oral but not transdermal estradiol therapy significantly lowered plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) antigen and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) antigen concentrations and PAI-1 activity, and increased D-dimer concentrations, suggesting increased fibrinolysis. The concentration of soluble Eselectin decreased and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) increased significantly in the oral but not in the transdermal or placebo groups. In the oral but not in the transdermal or placebo estradiol groups low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein (a) concentrations decreased while high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein AI and apolipoprotein AII concentrations increased significantly. LDL particle size remained unchanged. In summary, oral estradiol increased markers of fibrinolytic activity, decreased serum soluble E-selectin levels and induced potentially antiatherogenic changes in lipids and lipoproteins. In contrast to these beneficial effects, oral estradiol changed markers of coagulation towards hypercoagulability, and increased serum CRP concentrations. Transdermal estradiol or placebo had no effects on any of these parameters. These data demonstrate that oral estradiol does not have uniformly beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk markers and that the oral route of estradiol administration rather than the circulating free estradiol concentration is critical for any changes to be observed.

In patients with NIDDM who are receiving oral hypoglycemic drug therapy, the addition of NPH insulin in the evening improves glycemic control in a manner similar to combination therapy with NPH insulin in the morning, a two-insulin-injection regimen, or a multiple-insulin-injection regimen, but induces less weight gain and hyperinsulinemia. The data thus suggest that patients with NIDDM do not benefit from multiple insulin injections and that nocturnal insulin administration appears preferable to daytime administration.

No abstract