Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint replacement surgery. Most observational studies of PJI are retrospective or single-center, and reported management approaches and outcomes vary widely. We hypothesized that there would be substantial heterogeneity in PJI management and that most PJIs would present as late acute infections occurring as a consequence of bloodstream infections. Methods The Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational (PIANO) study is a prospective study at 27 hospitals. From July 2014 through December 2017, we enrolled all adults with a newly diagnosed PJI of a large joint. We collected data on demographics, microbiology, and surgical and antibiotic management over the first 3 months postpresentation. Results We enrolled 783 patients (427 knee, 323 hip, 25 shoulder, 6 elbow, and 2 ankle). The mode of presentation was late acute (>30 days postimplantation and <7 days of symptoms; 351, 45%), followed by early (≤30 days postimplantation; 196, 25%) and chronic (>30 days postimplantation with ≥30 days of symptoms; 148, 19%). Debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and implant retention constituted the commonest initial management approach (565, 72%), but debridement was moderate or less in 142 (25%) and the polyethylene liner was not exchanged in 104 (23%). Conclusions In contrast to most studies, late acute infection was the most common mode of presentation, likely reflecting hematogenous seeding. Management was heterogeneous, reflecting the poor evidence base and the need for randomized controlled trials.

There were 150 episodes involving 144 patients resulting in 3520 days of OPAT; the median duration on the programme was 22 days (range 4–106 days). Patient or carer administration occurred in the majority of episodes. The most common indication by far was bone or joint infection (47% of patients), followed by infective endocarditis (9%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently treated organism. The overall cure rate was 93%. On multivariate analysis, patients with two or more comorbidities had an increased risk of failure. Line-related complications occurred in 1.4/1000 catheter-days. Rash was the most common drug-related event. Despite the extensive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics there were no cases of Clostridium difficile infection during therapy and for up to 28 days post cessation of intravenous antibiotics. The cost of OPAT per patient excluding drug administration and home visits was approximately A$ 150.00/day, significantly lower than the cost of an inpatient bed, which is estimated to be A$ 500–800/day.5 CONCLUSION: OPAT using a patient or carer administration model is an effective and safe option for the management of selected patients with infection requiring intravenous antibiotics.

No abstract

BackgroundDiabetic foot infections (DFI) present a major morbidity, mortality and economic challenge for the tertiary health sector. However, lack of high quality evidence for specific treatment regimens for patients with DFIs may result in inconsistent management. This study aimed to identify DFI caseload proportion and patterns of clinical practice of Infectious Diseases (ID) Physicians and Trainees within Australia and New Zealand.MethodsA cross-sectional online survey of Australian and New Zealand ID Physicians and Trainees was undertaken, to estimate the overall ID caseload devoted to patients with DFIs and assess clinicians’ management practices of patients with DFIs.ResultsApproximately 28% (142/499) of ID Physicians and Trainees from Australia and New Zealand responded to the survey. DFI made up 19.2% of all ID consultations. Involvement in multidisciplinary teams (MDT) was common as 77.5% (93/120) of those responding indicated their patients had access to an inpatient or outpatient MDT. Significant heterogeneity of antimicrobial treatments was reported, with 82 unique treatment regimens used by 102 respondents in one scenario and 76 unique treatment regimens used by 101 respondents in the second scenario. The duration of therapy and the choice of antibiotics for microorganisms isolated from superficial swabs also varied widely.ConclusionsPatients with DFIs represent a significant proportion of an ID clinician’s caseload. This should be reflected in the ID training program. Large heterogeneity in practice between clinicians reflects a lack of evidence from well-designed clinical trials for patients with DFI and highlights the need for management guidelines informed by future trials.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-018-0256-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.