Aims Although cardiac involvement has prognostic significance in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is associated with severe forms, few studies have explored the prognostic role of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We investigated the link between TTE parameters and prognosis in COVID-19. Methods and results Consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to 24 French hospitals were retrospectively included. Comprehensive data, including clinical and biological parameters, were recorded at admission. Focused TTE was performed during hospitalization, according to clinical indication. Patients were followed for a primary composite outcome of death or transfer to intensive care unit (ICU) during hospitalization. Among 2878 patients, 445 (15%) underwent TTE. Most of these had cardiovascular risk factors, a history of cardiovascular disease, and were on cardiovascular treatments. Dilatation and dysfunction were observed in, respectively, 12% (48/412) and 23% (102/442) of patients for the left ventricle, and in 12% (47/407) and 16% (65/402) for the right ventricle (RV). Primary composite outcome occurred in 44% (n = 196) of patients [9% (n = 42) for death without ICU transfer and 35% (n = 154) for admission to ICU]. RV dilatation was the only TTE parameter associated with the primary outcome. After adjustment, male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 − 2.25; P = 0.02], higher body mass index (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 − 1.18; P = 0.01), anticoagulation (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33 − 0.86; P = 0.01), and RV dilatation (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.05 − 2.64; P = 0.03) remained independently associated with the primary outcome. Conclusion Echocardiographic evaluation of RV dilatation could be useful for assessing risk of severe COVID-19 developing in hospitalized patients.

this study has evidenced a disparity in performing instrumental diagnosis between COPD and HF groups that persists when both conditions coexist. Moreover, the pharmacological treatment of the two conditions shows a consistent under treatment with bronchodilators in COPD patients and with β-blockers in HF patients.

Introduction: Simulation-based training in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) seems promising. However, data are limited to non-randomized or single-center studies. To assess the impact of simulation-based vs. traditional teaching on TEE knowledge and performance for medical residents in cardiology.Materials and Methods: Nationwide prospective randomized multicenter study involving 43 centers throughout France allowing for the inclusion of >70% of all French cardiology residents. All cardiology residents naive from TEE will be included. Randomization with stratification by center will allocate residents to either a control group receiving theoretical knowledge by e-learning only, or to an intervention group receiving two simulation-based training sessions on a TEE simulator in addition.Results: All residents will undergo both a theoretical test (0–100 points) and a practical test on a TEE simulator (0–100 points) before and 3 months after the training. Satisfaction will be assessed by a 5-points Likert scale. The primary outcomes will be to compare the scores in the final theoretical and practical tests between the two groups, 3 months after the completion of the training.Conclusion: Data regarding simulation-based learning in TEE are limited to non-randomized or single-center studies. The randomized multicenter SIMULATOR study will assess the impact of simulation-based vs. traditional teaching on TEE knowledge and performance for medical residents in cardiology, and whether such an educational program should be proposed in first line for TEE teaching.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMVD) is common and associated with poorer outcomes in patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and the index of hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) are both invasive indexes of microvascular resistance proposed for the diagnosis of severe CMVD after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). However, these indexes are not routinely assessed in STEMI patients. Our main objective was to clarify the association between IMR or HMR and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), through a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. We searched Medline, PubMed, and Google Scholar for studies published in English until December 2020. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and rehospitalization for heart failure occurring after at least 6 months following CMVD assessment. We identified 6 studies, reporting outcomes in 1094 patients (mean age 59.7 ± 11.4 years; 18.2% of patients were women) followed-up from 6 months to 7 years. Severe CMVD, defined as IMR > 40 mmHg or HMR > 3mmHg/cm/sec was associated with MACE with a pooled HR of 3.42 [2.45; 4.79]. Severe CMVD is associated with an increased risk of long-term adverse cardiovascular events in patients with STEMI. Our results suggest that IMR and HMR are useful for the early identification of severe CMVD in patients with STEMI after PCI, and represent powerful prognostic assessments as well as new therapeutic targets for clinical intervention.