Sentinel lymph node biopsy-guided management seems to be safe when restricted to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IB to II cases where tumors are unifocal, less than 4 cm in size, and when there is no evidence of lymph node metastasis on clinical/radiological assessment. This reduces operative morbidity in this cohort of patients.
More than 50% of all gynecologic tumors can be classified as rare (defined as an incidence of ≤6 per 100,000 women) and usually have a poor prognosis owing to delayed diagnosis and treatment. In contrast to almost all other common solid tumors, the treatment of rare gynecologic tumors (RGT) is often based on expert opinion, retrospective studies, or extrapolation from other tumor sites with similar histology, leading to difficulty in developing guidelines for clinical practice. Currently, gynecologic cancer research, due to distinct scientific and technological challenges, is lagging behind. Moreover, the overall efforts for addressing these challenges are fragmented across different European countries and indeed, worldwide. The GYNOCARE, COST Action CA18117 (European Network for Gynecological Rare Cancer Research) programme aims to address these challenges through the creation of a unique network between key stakeholders covering distinct domains from concept to cure: basic research on RGT, biobanking, bridging with industry, and setting up the legal and regulatory requirements for international innovative clinical trials. On this basis, members of this COST Action, (Working Group 1, “Basic and Translational Research on Rare Gynecological Cancer”) have decided to focus their future efforts on the development of new approaches to improve the diagnosis and treatment of RGT. Here, we provide a brief overview of the current state-of-the-art and describe the goals of this COST Action and its future challenges with the aim to stimulate discussion and promote synergy across scientists engaged in the fight against this rare cancer worldwide.
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are widely used in therapeutic applications. Their plasticity and predisposition to differentiate into a variety of cell types, including those of the neuronal lineage, makes them ideal to study whether a selection of miRNAs may direct the differentiation of MSCs into neuroblasts or neuroblastoma to mature neurons. Following a short-listing, miR-107, 124 and 381 were selected as the most promising candidates for this differentiation. MSCs differentiated into cells of the neural lineage (Conditioned Cells) upon addition of conditioned medium (rich in microvesicles containing miRNAs) obtained from cultured SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Characterisation of stemness (including SOX2, OCT4, Nanog and HCG) and neural markers (including Nestin, MASH1, TUBB3 and NeuN1) provided insight regarding the neuronal state of each cell type. This was followed by transfection of the three miRNA antagonists and mimics, and quantification of their respective target genes. MiRNA target gene expression following transfection of MSCs with miRNA inhibitors and mimics demonstrated that these three miRNAs were not sufficient to induce differentiation. In conditioned cells the marginal changes in the miRNA target expression levels reflected potential for the modulation of intermediate neural progenitors and immature neuron cell types. Transfection of various combinations of miRNA inhibitors and/or mimics revealed more promise. Undoubtedly, a mix of biomolecules is being released by the SH-SY5Y in culture that induce MSCs to differentiate. Screening for those biomolecules acting synergistically with specific miRNAs will allow further combinatorial testing to elucidate the role of miRNA modulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.