This study aimed to characterize osteoarthritis (OA)-related chronic pain and disability in experimental cats with naturally occurring OA. Peak vertical ground reaction force (PVF), accelerometer-based motor activity (MA) and the von Frey anesthesiometer-induced paw withdrawal threshold were used to define OA and to test the efficacy of meloxicam. A diagnosis of OA was based on radiographic and orthopedic examinations. Cats with OA (n=39) and classified as non-OA (n=6) were used to assess the reliability and sensitivity of the parameters to assess OA over 3weeks while being administered placebo medication. A randomised parallel design study was then used to investigate the effects on OA of daily oral meloxicam treatment for 4weeks at different dose rates (0.025mg/kg, n=10mg/kg; 0.04mg/kg, n=10; 0.05mg/kg, n=9), compared to cats administered a placebo (n=10). The test-retest repeatability for each tool was good (intra-class correlation coefficient ⩾0.6). The PVF and the von Frey anesthesiometer-induced paw withdrawal threshold discriminated OA (P<0.05). Meloxicam did not add to the PVF improvement observed in placebo-treated cats during the treatment period (adj-P⩽0.01). The 0.025 and the 0.05mg/kg meloxicam-treated cats experienced a higher night-time (17:00-06:58h) MA intensity during the treatment period compared to the placebo period (adj-P=0.04, and 0.02, respectively) and this effect was not observed in the placebo group. The high allodynia rate observed in the 0.04mg/kg meloxicam-treated group may explain the lower responsiveness to the drug. The von Frey anesthesiometer-induced paw withdrawal threshold demonstrated no responsiveness to meloxicam. The results from this study indicated that daily oral meloxicam administration for 4weeks provided pain relief according to night-time MA.

This study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamics of alfaxalone in a 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin alfaxalone formulation (Alfaxan), Jurox Pty Ltd, Rutherford, NSW, Australia) in cats after single administration at clinical and supraclinical dose rates and as multiple maintenance doses. First, a prospective two-period cross-over study was conducted at single clinical and supraclinical doses. Second, a single group multiple dose study evaluated the effect of maintenance doses. Eight (five female and three male) domestic cats completed the cross-over experiment and six female cats completed the multiple dose study. In the first experiment, alfaxalone was administered intravenously (IV) at 5 or 25 mg/kg with a washout period of 14 days. In the second experiment, alfaxalone was administered IV at 5 mg/kg followed by four doses each of 2 mg/kg, administered at onset of responsiveness to a noxious stimulus. Blood was collected at prescribed intervals and analysed by LCMS for plasma alfaxalone concentration. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics were used to analyse the plasma alfaxalone data. The plasma clearance of alfaxalone at 5 and 25 mg/kg differed statistically at 25.1 and 14.8 mL/kg/min respectively. The elimination half lives were 45.2 and 76.6 min respectively. Alfaxalone has nonlinear pharmacokinetics in the cat. Nevertheless, for cats dosed with sequential maintenance doses, a regression line through their peak plasma concentrations indicated that there was no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic accumulation. The duration of nonresponsiveness after each maintenance dose was similar at approximately 6 min, indicating a lack of accumulation of pharmacodynamic effect. The cardiovascular and respiratory parameters measured in cats after administration of the labelled doses of Alfaxan were stable. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics of alfaxalone in cats are nonlinear. At clinical dose rates, however, neither alfaxalone nor its effects accumulated to a clinically relevant extent. Further, in the un-premedicated cat the induction and maintenance of surgical anaesthesia was free of untoward events after a dose of 5 mg alfaxalone/kg body weight followed by four sequential doses of 2 mg/kg as needed (i.e., approximately 7 to 8 mg/kg/h).

The pharmacokinetics of fluconazole following intravenous (i.v.) and oral (p.o.) administration and the penetration of fluconazole into cerebrospinal fluid, aqueous humour and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of the lungs were evaluated in adult male cats. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from serum concentration-time data obtained following i.v. and p.o. administration of 50 mg per cat using a cross-over study design. Fluconazole concentrations were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Mean total body clearance of fluconazole was 37.7 mL/h.kg, mean volume of distribution at steady state was 1.14 L/kg, mean residence time was 31.0 h and mean half-life of elimination was 25 h as derived by non-compartmental analysis of data. Absorption was complete. Mean ratios of fluid:serum fluconazole concentrations following administration of 50 mg fluconazole per day for 8 days were as follows: cerebrospinal fluid, 0.88; aqueous humour 0.79; ELF, 1.20. Fluconazole concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid, aqueous humour and ELF exceeded reported minimum inhibitory concentrations of fluconazole for pathogenic fungi. Results of this study suggest fluconazole can effectively be administered to cats at 50 mg per cat per day.

Electrically-assisted transdermal delivery (EATDD) is the facilitated transport of compounds across the skin using an electromotive force. It has been extensively explored as a potential means for delivering peptides and other hydrophilic, acid-labile or orally unstable products of biotechnology. The predominant mechanism for delivery is iontophoresis, although electroosmosis and electroporation have also been investigated. The focus of this review is to put these different mechanisms in perspective and relate them to the drug and skin model system being investigated.

Protamine zinc insulins are generally considered to be long acting, with slow absorption from subcutaneous tissue. Protamine zinc recombinant human insulin (PZIR) may be useful to treat diabetic dogs. The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PZIR in dogs. PZIR was administered subcutaneously to 10 healthy Beagles using an incomplete crossover design, at doses of 0.3 or 0.5 U/kg (each n=5), 0.8 U/kg (n=10), or 0.8 U/kg at three separate sites (n=6). Insulin and glucose concentrations were measured over 24 h. The shapes of insulin and glucose curves were variable among dogs, and the relationship between insulin dose, concentration, and glucose-lowering effect was nonlinear. For single-site 0.8 U/kg, median (range) onset of action was 3.5 h (0.5-10 h), time to glucose nadir was 14 h (5 to >24 h), and duration of action was >24 h (16 to >24 h). Mathematical model predictions of times to 50% and 90% insulin absorption, and fraction of insulin absorbed in 24 h, were not significantly different among protocols. Results confirm the tendency toward a late onset and long duration of action for PZIR in dogs. This insulin may be an alternative treatment option for diabetic dogs.