The Group Questionnaire (GQ) is a recently developed self-report measure of the therapeutic relationship based on Johnson and colleagues (2005) three-factor model; Positive Bonding, Positive Working, and Negative Relationship. This study validated Johnson's model with a new and extended sample and created a shorter 40-item trial version. SEM analysis of the GQ tested whether it produced the same three-factor structure found in three earlier studies with 486 participants from three populations-outpatient university counseling center, non-patient AGPA process groups, and inpatient state hospital. Results of further SEM refinements demonstrated that a final 30-item version had good fit to the three-factor model although distinct differences in response pattern were found between the three populations. Implications for future utility and clinical relevance of the GQ are discussed.

Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) systems that identify clients at-risk for treatment failure using outcome and therapeutic process measures are a recognized evidence-based practice. However, only 3 empirical studies have tested ROMs in group therapy, producing mixed results. This randomized clinical trial tested the Outcome Questionnaire System, the ROM system with the most empirical support for individual therapy patients, with 430 group therapy patients who were randomly assigned to 2 experimental arms (Group Questionnaire [GQ] + Outcome Questionnaire-45 [OQ-45] vs. OQ-45). Given the strong evidence for progress feedback, the primary purpose of this study was to ascertain if therapeutic relationship feedback using the GQ reduced rates of relationship deterioration and failure when progress feedback was held constant. Group leaders simultaneously ran pairs of groups that were randomly assigned to the 2 conditions. Of the 430 patients enrolled in 58 groups, 374 attended more than 4 sessions. Results showed that therapeutic relationship predicted improvement in outcome and that feedback reversed the course of relationship deterioration and reduced rates of relationship failure. Although there were no effects on attendance and dropout for feedback, the 2 experimental arms produced mixed results for the OQ-45 not-on-track cases. The combined relationship and progress feedback (GQ/OQ-45) was associated with fewer outcome deterioration cases, while the progress feedback condition (OQ-45) showed higher outcome improvement cases. Findings are discussed with respect to previous group ROM studies, clinical implications, and future research. (PsycINFO Database Record

Prior research in individual therapy has provided evidence that therapists are poor predictors of client outcome and often misjudge clients' perceptions of the therapeutic relationship. The focus of the current research was to conduct a similar predictive study in a group setting. Group therapists were recruited from a university counseling center and a state psychiatric hospital; 64 group members and 10 group leaders participated in the study. We tested therapist accuracy in predicting client outcome and perceived quality of therapeutic relationship. Results suggested that therapists underestimate the number of clients who deteriorate during therapy and were unable to accurately predict client perceptions of the group relationship, replicating findings from larger samples in the individual literature. Results suggest that using outcome and process measures as feedback tools may be also useful for clinicians leading groups.

This study examined psychotherapy utilization, presenting concerns, reported distress levels, and psychotherapy outcomes among Polynesian American students presenting for services at a counseling center at a large intermountain university on the mainland U.S. We collected data at intake, during therapy sessions, and at termination for 415 Polynesian American students over a 17-year period. Polynesian American students were equally likely to utilize counseling services as European American students but were more likely to drop out earlier. At intake these students shared higher numbers of presenting concerns and greater levels of selfreported emotional and psychological distress than did European American students. Implications for counseling center programs and services are discussed.

Results support meta-analytic findings of format equivalence in a naturalistic setting for group and individual. Referral practices and future results are discussed.