The clinical manifestations of coronary artery anomalies vary in severity, with some anomalies causing severe symptoms and cardiovascular sequelae and others being benign. Cardiovascular computed tomography (CT) has emerged as the standard of reference for identification and characterization of coronary artery anomalies. Therefore, it is important for the reader of cardiovascular CT images to be thoroughly familiar with the spectrum of coronary artery anomalies. Hemodynamically significant anomalies include atresia, origin from the pulmonary artery, interarterial course, and congenital fistula. Non-hemodynamically significant anomalies include duplication; high origin; a prepulmonic, transseptal, or retroaortic course; shepherd's crook right coronary artery; and systemic termination. In general, coronary arteries with an interarterial course are associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Coronary artery anomalies that result in shunting, including congenital fistula and origin from the pulmonary artery, are also commonly symptomatic and may cause steal of blood from the myocardium. Radiologists should be familiar with each specific variant and its specific constellation of potential implications.
With appropriate patient selection, surgical planning and robotic experience, completely intracorporeal robotic level III inferior vena cava thrombectomy is feasible and can be performed efficiently. Larger experience, longer followup and comparison with open surgery are needed to confirm these initial outcomes.
Between October 1, 1985, and April 1, 1988, we performed balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 170 patients (mean age [+/- SD], 77 +/- 5 years) who had symptomatic aortic stenosis. The procedure was completed successfully in 168 patients and resulted in significant increases in the mean (+/- SD) aortic-valve area (from 0.6 +/- 0.2 to 0.9 +/- 0.3 cm2) and cardiac output (from 4.6 +/- 3.4 to 4.8 +/- 1.4 liters per minute) and decreases in the peak aortic-valve pressure gradient (from 71 +/- 20 to 36 +/- 14 mm Hg) (P less than 0.01 for all three comparisons). There were six in-hospital deaths, and five patients required early aortic-valve replacement. Follow-up data were available for all patients, for a period averaging 9.1 months. In addition to the 6 patients who died in the hospital, 25 patients died an average of 6.4 +/- 5.3 months after discharge. Symptoms recurred in 44 patients; they were managed by repeat valvuloplasty in 16 patients, by aortic-valve replacement in 17, and by medical therapy in 11. At the most recent follow-up examination, the symptoms of 103 patients had improved after valvuloplasty; this number includes 15 patients with restenosis who successfully underwent redilation. Life-table analysis indicates that the probability of survival 12 months after the procedure was 74 percent. We conclude that balloon aortic valvuloplasty is an effective palliative therapy for some elderly patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Symptoms improve in the majority of patients; although restenosis is common, it can be managed in some patients by repeat balloon dilation.
Minimally invasive AVR via an anterior right thoracotomy with predominately central cannulation can be performed with morbidity and mortality similar to that of a sternotomy approach. There appear to be advantages to this minimally invasive approach when compared with sternotomy in terms of less intraoperative blood product usage, lower wound infection rates and decreased hospital stays. If mortality and the occurrence of adverse events are taken together, MIAVR may be associated with better outcomes. As minimally invasive AVR becomes more common, further long-term follow-up is needed and a prospective multicentre randomized trial would be warranted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.