Cytolytic CD8+ effector cells fall into two subpopulations based on cytokine secretion. Type 1 CD8+ T cells (Tc1) secrete IFN-γ, whereas type 2 CD8+ T cells (Tc2) secrete IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10. Using an OVA-transfected B16 lung metastases model, we assessed the therapeutic effects of adoptively transferred OVA-specific Tc1 and Tc2 subpopulations in mice bearing established pulmonary malignancy. Effector cell-treated mice exhibiting high (5 × 105) tumor burdens experienced significant (p < 0.05) delays in mortality compared with those of untreated control mice, whereas high proportions (70–90%) of mice receiving therapy with low (1 × 105) tumor burdens survived indefinitely. Long-term tumor immunity was evident by resistance to lethal tumor rechallenge, heightened levels of systemic OVA Ag-specific CTL responses ex vivo, and detection of long-lived TCR transgene-positive donor cells accompanied by an elevation in the total numbers of CD8+ CD44high activated and/or memory T cells at sites of tumor growth. Long-lasting protection by Tc2 and Tc1 effector cells were dependent, in part, on both the level of tumor burden and effector cell-derived IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-γ, respectively. We conclude that Tc1 and Tc2 effector cells provide immunity by different mechanisms that subsequently potentiate host-derived antitumor responses.

The importance of CD4 T cells in orchestrating the immune system and their role in inducing effective T cell-mediated therapies for the treatment of patients with select established malignancies are undisputable. Through a complex and balanced array of direct and indirect mechanisms of cellular activation and regulation, this functionally diverse family of lymphocytes can potentially promote tumor eradication, long-term tumor immunity, and aid in establishing and/or rebalancing immune cell homeostasis through interaction with other immune cell populations within the highly dynamic tumor environment. However, recent studies have uncovered additional functions and roles for CD4 T cells, some of which are independent of other lymphocytes, that can not only influence and contribute to tumor immunity but paradoxically promote tumor growth and progression. Here, we review the recent advances in our understanding of the various CD4 T cell lineages and their signature cytokines in disease progression and/or regression. We discuss their direct and indirect mechanistic interplay among themselves and with other responding cells of the antitumor response, their potential roles and abilities for “plasticity” and memory cell generation within the hostile tumor environment, and their potentials in cancer treatment and immunotherapy.

No abstract

Cytolytic CD8+ effector cells fall into two subpopulations based on cytokine secretion. Type 1 CD8+ T cells (Tc1) secrete IFN-γ, whereas type 2 CD8+ T cells (Tc2) secrete IL-4 and IL-5. Both effector cell subpopulations display predominantly perforin-dependent cytolysis in vitro. Using an OVA-transfected B16 lung metastases model, we show that adoptively transferred OVA-specific Tc1 and Tc2 cells induce considerable suppression, but not cure, of pulmonary metastases. However, long-term tumor immunity prolonged survival times indefinitely and was evident by resistance to lethal tumor rechallenge. At early stages after therapy, protection by Tc2 and Tc1 effector cells were dependent in part on effector cell-derived IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-γ, respectively. Whereas effector cell-derived perforin was not necessary. Over time the numbers of both donor cells diminished to low, yet still detectable, levels. Concomitantly, Tc1 and Tc2 effector cell therapies potentiated endogenous recipient-derived antitumor responses by inducing 1) local T cell-derived chemokines associated with type 1-like immune responses; 2) elevated levels of recipient-derived OVA tetramer-positive CD8 memory T cells that were CD44high, CD122+, and Ly6Chigh that predominantly produced IFN-γ and TNF-α; and 3) heightened numbers of activated recipient-derived Th1 and Tc1 T cell subpopulations expressing CD25+, CD69+, and CD95+ cell surface activation markers. Moreover, both Tc2 and Tc1 effector cell therapies were dependent in part on recipient-derived IFN-γ and TNF-α for long-term survival and protection. Collectively, Tc1 and Tc2 effector cell immunotherapy mediate long-term tumor immunity by different mechanisms that subsequently potentiate endogenous recipient-derived type 1 antitumor responses.

Established EG7 tumors expressing OVA and growing at an intradermal site become rapidly reduced in size following adoptive therapy with in vitro-generated type I CD8 T cell (Tc1) effectors generated from naive CD8 T cells from transgenic TCR OVA-specific mice. Tc1 effectors kill EG7 target cells in vitro by a perforin-dependent mechanism. However, we show that there is no quantitative diminution of the initial phase of antitumor activity in vivo, whether the Tc1 effectors are derived from perforin-, Fas ligand-, or TNF-deficient transgenic TCR mice or whether the recipients are perforin deficient. Tumors are also equally well controlled whether the Tc1 effectors come from mice deficient in perforin plus Fas ligand or perforin plus TNF. Control of tumor growth is diminished when Tc1 effectors generated from IFN-γ-deficient mice are used. We conclude that control of tumor growth is not in any way affected by loss of contact-mediated lytic mechanisms, and conclude that the CD8 effectors must act by recruiting host effector mechanisms to control tumor growth.