BackgroundObservational studies have linked proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with serious adverse effects. The study aimed to evaluate internists’ perceptions of PPI harms and effects on prescribing.MethodsThis was an online survey of a representative sample of the American College of Physicians in 2013. We queried familiarity with and concern about PPI adverse effects (1 - 7 Likert-type scales, anchored by “not at all” and “extremely”). We also asked how frequently (often, sometimes, rarely, or never) participants used any of three “de-escalation” strategies to stop or reduce PPIs because of concern about adverse effects: reducing patients’ PPI dose, switching to H2 blocker, or discontinuing PPI. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate associations between sometimes/often using any PPI de-escalation strategy and gender, time in practice, familiarity, and concern.ResultsThe response rate was 53% (487/914). Seventy percent were male, median time in practice was 11 - 15 years, and most practiced general medicine (58%). Ninety-nine percent reported at least some familiarity with reported adverse effects (mean 4.9, standard deviation (SD) 1.0), and 98% reported at least some concern (mean 4.6, SD 1.3). Sixty-three percent reported sometimes/often reducing the PPI dose, 52% switching to H2 blocker, and 44% discontinuing PPI. In multivariable analysis, familiarity with adverse effects (OR 1.66 (1.31 - 2.10) for 1-point increase, P < 0.001) and concern (OR 2.14 (1.76 - 2.61) for 1-point increase, P < 0.001) were independently associated with de-escalation. Gender and time in practice had no effects.ConclusionAlmost all internists report awareness and concern about PPI adverse effects, and most are de-escalating PPIs as a result. Research on which approach is most effective for which patients is critically important.
R ecent studies have linked proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use to serious adverse effects, including bone fracture, chronic kidney disease, dementia, and ischemic stroke. Although it remains unclear whether PPIs truly cause these adverse effects, this potential has forced physicians to carefully consider the safety and utility of long-term PPI use in their patients, a topic included in the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation's Choosing Wisely campaign. 1 Using case vignettes, we sought to evaluate how internists' willingness to stop PPI varies according to drug indication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.