MgO and Al2O3 were sintered by two types of processes: a conventional isothermal sintering and a two-step sintering consisting of a n initial low-temperature precoarsening treatment before conventional isothermal sintering. The final microstructure from two-step sintering can be more uniform and finer than that of compacts sintered conventionally. A narrow-size-distribution a l u m i n a powder was sintered under constant-heating-rate conditions, with and without a precoarsening treatment, and the results were compared. The differences between two-step and conventional processing were clarified by experiments on precoarsened and as-received ZnO powders. These compacts were precoarsened at 450°C for 90 h with virtually no increase in the overall density. The resulting grain size was 1.7 times the starting one, but the standard deviation of the precoarsened powder size distribution was smaller than that of the asreceived powder. Precoarsened compacts sintered to nearly full density showed improved homogeneity. The sintering stress of the precoarsened ZnO was approximately 0.8 that of the as-received one. A computational model has been used with two components of coarsening to describe the differences in pore spacing evolution between the precoarsened and the as-received system. The benefit of two-step sintering is attributed to the increase in uniformity resulting from precoarsening. The increased uniformity decreases sintering damage and allows the system to stay in the open porosity state longer, delaying or inhibiting additional coarsening (grain growth) during the final stage of densification. Twostep sintering is especially useful for nonuniform powder systems with a wide size distribution and is a simple and convenient method of making more uniform ceramic bodies without resorting to specialized powders or complicated heat schedules. [
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.