BACKGROUNDCommunity transmission of coronavirus 2019 was detected in the state of Washington in February 2020. METHODSWe identified patients from nine Seattle-area hospitals who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with confirmed infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clinical data were obtained through review of medical records. The data reported here are those available through March 23, 2020. Each patient had at least 14 days of follow-up. RESULTSWe identified 24 patients with confirmed Covid-19. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 64±18 years, 63% were men, and symptoms began 7±4 days before admission. The most common symptoms were cough and shortness of breath; 50% of patients had fever on admission, and 58% had diabetes mellitus. All the patients were admitted for hypoxemic respiratory failure; 75% (18 patients) needed mechanical ventilation. Most of the patients (17) also had hypotension and needed vasopressors. No patient tested positive for influenza A, influenza B, or other respiratory viruses. Half the patients (12) died between ICU day 1 and day 18, including 4 patients who had a do-not-resuscitate order on admission. Of the 12 surviving patients, 5 were discharged home, 4 were discharged from the ICU but remained in the hospital, and 3 continued to receive mechanical ventilation in the ICU. CONCLUSIONSDuring the first 3 weeks of the Covid-19 outbreak in the Seattle area, the most common reasons for admission to the ICU were hypoxemic respiratory failure leading to mechanical ventilation, hypotension requiring vasopressor treatment, or both. Mortality among these critically ill patients was high. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.
We propose in this paper a unified approach for testing the association between rare variants and phenotypes in sequencing association studies. This approach maximizes power by adaptively using the data to optimally combine the burden test and the nonburden sequence kernel association test (SKAT). Burden tests are more powerful when most variants in a region are causal and the effects are in the same direction, whereas SKAT is more powerful when a large fraction of the variants in a region are noncausal or the effects of causal variants are in different directions. The proposed unified test maintains the power in both scenarios. We show that the unified test corresponds to the optimal test in an extended family of SKAT tests, which we refer to as SKAT-O. The second goal of this paper is to develop a small-sample adjustment procedure for the proposed methods for the correction of conservative type I error rates of SKAT family tests when the trait of interest is dichotomous and the sample size is small. Both small-sample-adjusted SKAT and the optimal unified test (SKAT-O) are computationally efficient and can easily be applied to genome-wide sequencing association studies. We evaluate the finite sample performance of the proposed methods using extensive simulation studies and illustrate their application using the acute-lung-injury exome-sequencing data of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Exome Sequencing Project.
Lymphodepletion chemotherapy followed by infusion of CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T cells has produced impressive antitumor responses in patients with refractory CD19 B-cell malignancies but is often associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Our understanding of CRS continues to evolve, and identification of the kinetics of CRS and predictive clinical and laboratory biomarkers of severity are needed to evaluate strategies to mitigate toxicity. We report the clinical presentation of and identify biomarkers of severe CRS in 133 adult patients who received CD19 CAR T cells. CRS developed in 70% of patients, including 62.5% with grade 1 to 3 CRS (grade 1, 26%; grade 2, 32%; grade 3, 4.5%), 3.8% with grade 4, and 3.8% with grade 5. A majority of cases of grade ≥4 CRS occurred during CAR T-cell dose finding. Multivariable analysis of baseline characteristics identified high marrow tumor burden, lymphodepletion using cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, higher CAR T-cell dose, thrombocytopenia before lymphodepletion, and manufacturing of CAR T cells without selection of CD8 central memory T cells as independent predictors of CRS. Severe CRS was characterized by hemodynamic instability, capillary leak, and consumptive coagulopathy. Angiopoietin-2 and von Willebrand factor, which are biomarkers of endothelial activation, were increased during severe CRS and also before lymphodepletion in patients who subsequently developed CRS. We describe a classification-tree algorithm to guide studies of early intervention after CAR T-cell infusion for patients at high risk of severe CRS. These data provide a framework for early intervention studies to facilitate safer application of effective CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.
SumlnaryCD14 is a 55-kD protein found as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein on the surface of monocytes, macrophages, and polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and as a soluble protein in the blood. Both forms of CD14 participate in the serum-dependent responses of cells to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). While CD14 has been described as a receptor for complexes of LPS with LPS-binding protein (LBP), there has been no direct evidence showing whether a ternary complex of LPS, LBP, and CD14 is formed, or whether CD14 binds LPS directly. Using nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (native PAGE), we show that recombinant soluble CD14 (rsCD14) binds LPS in the absence of LBP or other proteins. Binding of LPS to CD14 is stable and of low stoichiometry (one or two molecules of LPS per rsCD14). Recombinant LBP (rLBP) does not form detectable ternary complexes with rsCD14 and LPS, but it does accelerate the binding of LPS to rsCD14, rLBP facilitates the interaction of LPS with rsCD14 at substoichiometric concentrations, suggesting that LBP functions catalytically, as a lipid transfer protein. Complexes of LPS and rsCD14 formed in the absence of LBP or other serum proteins strongly stimulate integrin function on PMN and expression of E-selectin on endothelial cells, demonstrating that LBP is not necessary for CD14-dependent stimulation of cells. These results suggest that CD14 acts as a soluble and cell surface receptor for LPS, and that LBP may function primarily to accelerate the binding of LPS to CD14. R cent work has described several serum and cell surface proteins that are necessary for responses of leukocytes to low concentrations of bacterial LPS (endotoxin) (1). LPSbinding protein (LBP),I an acute phase reactant, binds LPS (2) and greatly enhances the sensitivity of cells to LPS (3). Normal serum and plasma also enhance responses to LPS, and a multicomponent factor termed septin has been proposed to serve this function (4). LBP (5) and septin (4) each bind to LPS-coated particles and promote the interaction of these particles with CD14 (6, 7), a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein of monocytes, macrophages, and PMN (8, 9, 10). CD14 is necessary for serum-or LBPmediated responses of cells to LPS, such as the production 1 Abbreviations used in this paper: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; ELPS, sheep erythrocytes coated with LPS; ELPS-LBP, ELPS opsonized with LBP; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; HAP, Dulbecco's PBS with 0.5 U/ml aprotinin, 0.05% human serum albumin, 3 mM D-glucose; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; LBP, LPS-binding protein; NHP, normal human plasma; PD-EDTA, Dulbecco's PBS lacking Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ with 1 mM EDTA; Ra, strain R60; Re, strain R595; rLBP, recombinant LBP; rsCD14, recombinant soluble CD14. of TNF by monocytes (6) and an increase in the adhesive properties of 132-integrins on PMN (7).Cells that do not express CD14, such as endothelial cells, also respond to low concentrations of LPS in the presence of serum. We have shown that these resp...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.