Angina without coronary artery disease (CAD) has substantial morbidity and is present in 10–30% of patients undergoing angiography. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is present in 50–65% of these patients. The optimal treatment of this cohort is undefined. We performed a systematic review to evaluate treatment strategies for objectively defined CMD in the absence of CAD. We included studies assessing therapy in human subjects with angina and coronary flow reserve (CFR) or myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) <2.5 by positron emission tomography (PET), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), dilution methods, or intracoronary Doppler in the absence of coronary artery stenosis ≥50% or structural heart disease. Only 8 articles met strict inclusion criteria. The articles were heterogeneous, using different treatments, end-points, and definitions of CMD. Small sample sizes severely limit the power of these studies, with an average of 11 patients per analysis. Studies evaluating, sildenafil, quinapril, estrogen, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) application demonstrated benefits in their respective endpoints. No benefit was found with L-arginine, doxazosin, pravastatin, and diltiazem. Our systematic review highlights that there is little data to support therapies for CMD. We assess the data meeting rigorous inclusion criteria and review the related but excluded literature. We additionally describe the next steps needed to address this research gap, including a standardized definition of CMD, routine assessment of CMD in studies of chest pain without obstructive CAD, and specific therapy assessment in the population with confirmed CMD.

No abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of cardiopulmonary bypass that provides life-saving support to critically ill patients whose illness is progressing despite maximal conventional support. Use in adults is expanding, however neurological injuries are common. Currently, the existing brain imaging tools are a snapshot in time and require high-risk patient transport. Here we assess the feasibility of measuring diffuse correlation spectroscopy, transcranial Doppler ultrasound, electroencephalography, and auditory brainstem responses at the bedside, and developing a cerebral autoregulation metric. We report preliminary results from two patients, demonstrating feasibility and laying the foundation for future studies monitoring neurological health during ECMO.

Introduction: Pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) were developed to assist with diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and have been shown to reduce 90-day mortality. The pharmacist's role on the PERT is not well defined. Objectives: Describe the pharmacist's role as a PERT member and determine if pharmacists can improve time to anticoagulation and promote use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) instead of unfractionated heparin (UFH). Methods: A retrospective, observational study of adult patients with massive or submassive PE between January 2014 and May 2020. Patient demographics, clinical variables, anticoagulation treatment/timing, and pharmacist activities during PERT response were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups for comparisons (pre-PERT vs post-PERT with a pharmacist vs post-PERT without a pharmacist). Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-squared analysis were used for continuous and categorical data, respectively. Results: A total of 573 patients were included (mean age 63.2 ± 15.6 years, 54% male, 78% submassive PE); 137 in the pre-PERT and 436 in the post-PERT groups. Within the post-PERT group, 305 patients (70%) had a pharmacist as a member of the PERT, of which 222 (73%) had a documented pharmacotherapy-related intervention/activity. Most (n = 178, 58%) involved a pharmacist facilitating ordering/ administration of an anticoagulant/thrombolytic. Median time from diagnosis to anticoagulation was significantly reduced in the post-PERT groups (pre-PERT: 104 minutes [IQR 124.5], post-PERT with a pharmacist: 63 minutes [IQR 84], post-PERT without a pharmacist: 75.5 minutes [IQR 113], P = .0001). More patients in the post-PERT groups received LMWH compared to UFH when a pharmacist was involved vs without a pharmacist (69.5% vs 53.3%, P = .0019) and major bleeding events were reduced