Cytokine gene polymorphisms affecting cytokine production may influence rejection and graft-versus-host disease following solid organ and haemopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, respectively. Polymorphisms in the regulatory regions of several cytokine genes have been described; for example, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) has a G/A substitution at position -308, interleukin-2 (IL-2) has a T/G substitution at position -330 and interleukin-10 (IL-10) has substitutions at positions -1082(G/A), -819(C/T) and -592(C/A). Microsatellites associated with cytokine production have been detected in the first intron of the IFN-gamma gene and flanking the TNF-alpha gene. In this study, we have genotyped a single panel of healthy Northern European Caucasoids living in the south-east of England for the above-mentioned polymorphisms and compared the results to those published for other populations. A PCR method using sequence-specific primers (SSP) was developed for genotyping the IL-2 polymorphism, and the ABI PRISMtrade mark 310 genetic analyser was used to detect the TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma microsatellites. The allele frequencies of all the studied polymorphisms were consistent with those reported for other UK Caucasoid populations, but differences were observed when compared to other Oriental, African and Caucasoid groups. If these cytokine polymorphisms prove to have functional consequences, then any differences across population groups may have significant clinical relevance in disease and in the outcome of solid organ and HSC transplantation.

BackgroundIn the IMAGE study, rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) inhibited joint damage and improved clinical outcomes at 1 year in MTX-naïve patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess joint damage progression and clinical outcomes over 2 years.MethodsPatients (n=755) were randomised to receive rituximab 2×500 mg+MTX, 2×1000 mg+MTX or placebo+MTX. The placebo-controlled period continued to week 104. Two-year end points were defined as secondary or exploratory and included change in total Genant-modified Sharp score (mTSS), total erosion score and joint space narrowing score from baseline to week 104. Clinical efficacy and physical function end points were also assessed.ResultsAt 2 years, rituximab 2×1000 mg+MTX maintained inhibition of progressive joint damage versus MTX alone (mTSS change 0.41 vs 1.95; p<0.0001 (79% inhibition)), and a higher proportion of patients receiving rituximab 2×1000 mg+MTX had no radiographic progression over 2 years compared with those receiving MTX alone (57% vs 37%; p<0.0001). Contrary to 1-year results, exploratory analysis of rituximab 2×500 mg+MTX at 2 years showed that progressive joint damage was slowed by ∼61% versus placebo+MTX (mTSS, exploratory p=0.0041). Improvements in clinical signs and symptoms and physical function seen after 1 year in rituximab-treated patients versus those receiving placebo were maintained at year 2. Safety profiles were similar between groups.ConclusionsTreatment with rituximab 2×1000 mg+MTX was associated with sustained improvements in radiographic, clinical and functional outcomes over 2 years.Clinical trials.gov identifier NCT00299104.

Objective. To assess the efficacy and safety profiles of two different rituximab retreatment regimens in patients with RA.Methods. Four hundred and ninety-three RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX recruited into rituximab Phase II/III studies received further courses of open-label rituximab based on two approaches: (i) treatment to target (TT): patients assessed 24 weeks after each course and retreated if not in remission [DAS in 28 joints based on ESR (DAS-28-ESR) ≥ 2.6]; (ii) treatment as needed (PRN): patients retreated at the physician’s discretion ≥24 weeks following the first course and ≥16 weeks following further courses, if both swollen and tender joint counts were ≥8. All courses consisted of i.v. rituximab 2 × 1000 mg 2 weeks apart plus MTX. Observed data were analysed according to treatment strategy.Results. Multiple courses of rituximab maintained or improved responses irrespective of regimen. TT provided tighter control of disease activity with significantly greater improvements in DAS-28-ESR and lower HAQ-disability index scores vs PRN. TT resulted in significantly more patients achieving major clinical response. PRN resulted in recurrence of disease symptoms between courses, with TT significantly reducing the incidence of RA flares. Despite more frequent retreatment with TT compared with PRN, the rates of serious adverse events and serious infections were comparable between regimens.Conclusions. Retreatment with rituximab based on 24-week evaluations and to a target of DAS-28-ESR remission leads to improved efficacy and tighter control of disease activity compared with PRN without a compromised safety profile. TT may be the preferable rituximab treatment regimen for patients with RA.