The trophic interactions between plants, insect herbivores and their predators are complex and prone to trophic cascades. Theory predicts that predators increase plant biomass by feeding on herbivores. However, it remains unclear whether different types of predators regulate herbivores to the same degree, and how intraguild predation impacts these trophic interactions. Despite past syntheses having confirmed cascading effects of vertebrate predators on terrestrial arthropods, we lack a more comprehensive look at the effects of other predators on a global scale. Here we report a meta-analysis of 486 experiments gathered from 157 publications reporting the effect of insectivorous vertebrates (birds and bats) and ants on abundances of predatory (spiders, ants, others) and herbivorous (chewers and others) arthropods; on arthropod richness and plant damage. Generally, the absence of vertebrate predators led to the increase of predatory arthropods by 18%, herbivorous arthropods by 75%, and plant damage by 47%. In contrast, after the removal of ants, the increase in the abundances of other predatory arthropods did not compensate for missing ants, herbivore arthropods increased their abundances by 53%, and plant damage increased by 146%. The effects of ant exclosures were stronger in communities at lower elevations and latitudes, while we did not detect any clear geographical patterns in the effect of vertebrate exclosures. Neither precipitation nor NDVI had a significant impact on most of the measured effects, and the effect of exclosures was robust for both plant growth forms and different habitat types. We found vertebrate insectivores to be the more dominant predators of arthropods, but we detected that the strength of their trophic cascades was weakened by intraguild predation. On the other hand, we found that although ants were relatively less dominant as predators, and their influence was detectable only in the most productive sites, the effect of trophic cascades on plants they caused was stronger than that of vertebrate insectivores.
AimThe strength of species interactions is traditionally expected to become stronger toward the Equator. However, recent studies have reported opposite or inconsistent latitudinal trends in the bottom-up (plant quality) and top-down (natural enemies) forces driving insect herbivory, possibly because these forces have rarely been studied concomitantly. This makes previous attempts to understand the effect of large scale climatic gradients on insect herbivory unsuccessful. Location Europe Time period 2018-2019Major taxa studied Quercus robur MethodsWe used scholar-based citizen science to simultaneously test for latitudinal variation in plantherbivore-natural enemy interactions. We further investigated the underlying climatic factors associated with variation in herbivory, leaf chemistry and attack rates in Quercus robur across its complete latitudinal range in Europe. We quantified insect herbivory and the occurrence of specialist herbivores as well as leaf chemistry and bird attack rates on dummy caterpillars on 261 oak trees. ResultsClimatic factors rather than latitude per se were the best predictors of the large-scale (geographical) variation in the incidence of gall-inducers and leaf-miners as well as of leaf nutritional quality. However, insect herbivory, plant chemical defences (leaf phenolics) and bird attack rates were not influenced by latitude or climatic factors. The incidence of leaf-miners increased with increasing concentrations of hydrolysable tannins and decreased with those of condensed tannins, whereas the incidence of gall-inducers increased with increasing leaf soluble sugar concentration and decreased with increasing leaf C:N ratios. However, neither other traits nor bird attack rates varied with insect herbivory. Main conclusionsThese findings help to refine our understanding of the bottom-up and top-down mechanisms driving geographical variation in plant-herbivore interactions, and urge for further examination of the drivers of insect herbivory on trees.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.