Postoperative cognitive outcome was significantly better in patients with intraoperative cerebral oximetry monitoring. Prolonged rSO2 desaturation is a predictor of cognitive decline and has to be avoided.
Aortic manipulation releases embolic material, thereby enhancing the probability of adverse neurologic outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We prospectively evaluated 59 patients undergoing CABG. Patients in the single (SC, n = 37) and multiple clamp (MC, n = 22) groups were comparable in relation to age and operative risk (p > 0.05). Neurocognitive evaluation consisted of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Color Trails Test A, the Grooved Pegboard test and the Mini-Mental State Examination. Data acquisition was performed preoperatively, early postoperatively and at the 4-month follow-up. Intraoperative transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring was used to quantify the embolic load in relation to different aortic clamping strategies. Preoperative neurocognitive results were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative delirium was greater in the MC group but this failed to reach statistical significance (23% vs 8%, p = 0.14). SC patients had fewer embolization signals (270 ± 181 vs 465 ± 160, p < 0.0001). Early postoperative neurocognitive results were depressed in comparison to preoperative values in both groups (p < 0.05 for multiple comparisons). The magnitude of this cognitive depression was greater in the MC group (p < 0.05 for multiple comparisons). Preoperative levels of neurocognition were restored at follow-up in the SC group in all tests except the AVLT. A trend towards improvements in neurocognitive performances at follow-up was also observed in the MC group. Residual attention, motor skill and memory deficits were, however, documented with multiple tests. In conclusion, the embolic burden was significantly lower in the SC group. This TCD imaging outcome translated into fewer early cognition deficits and superior late restoration of function.
Background: Neurologic defi cits are perhaps the most feared form of adverse outcome following cardiac surgery. Aortic trauma generates emboli and hence harbors the potential for neurocognitive injury. The single aortic clamp strategy of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) aims at reducing aortic manipulation. We hypothesized that this strategy will lead to a reduction in the number microembolic signals (MES) evaluated by transcranial Doppler (TCD), a surrogate measure of cerebral embolism.Methods: This pilot study was based on a prospective analysis of 22 patients in whom CABG was performed either with a single aortic clamp (SC group) or with a conventional multiple aortic side-clamp technique (MC group). The 2 groups did not differ with respect to mean age (60 ± 6 years versus 65 ± 8 years, not statistically signifi cant [NS]) or EuroSCORE (2.1 ± 1.5 versus 2.9 ± 2, P = NS). The neurocognitive evaluation was based on the mini-mental state examination (MMSE). The preoperative MMSE values for the SC and MC groups were similar (29.5 ± 0.5 and 29.2 ± 1, respectively; P = NS).Results: The total number of solid-particle embolization signals secondary to aortic manipulation was lower in the SC group than in the MC group (72 ± 28 versus 127 ± 69, P = .02). Neurocognitive performance was moderately reduced in both groups compared with preoperative values. This reduction was more pronounced in the MC group than in the SC group (22.2 ± 4.1 versus 25.3 ± 1.6, P = .02). One patient in the MC group had a reversible ischemic neurologic defi cit (P = NS). There were no deaths or perioperative myocardial infarctions in either group.Conclusions: The single-clamp CABG strategy led to a reduction in MES, indicating a less pronounced embolic burden than with the conventional side-clamp CABG strategy. This strategy translated into a better performance in postoperative neurocognitive testing in the SC group of patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.