Introduction Pediatric radial neck and head fractures are rare, accounting for only 1% of all fractures in children. The aim of this study is to describe the management and results of the respective fracture types and different injury characteristics. Materials and methods This study performs a retrospective data analysis of 100 consecutive patients with a fracture of the proximal radius treated in a single high-volume pediatric trauma center. Results One hundred patients [mean age 7.5 years (1–15)] were documented with a fracture of the proximal radius between 3/2011 and 12/2019. The gender distribution was 62 girls and 38 boys. Twenty-seven patients had concomitant injuries. Conservative treatment was performed in 63 patients (Judet I = 27; II = 30; III = 6; Mason I = 2) using an above-the-elbow cast for 21 days (6–35). Surgical treatment was performed in 37 patients (Judet II = 3; III = 22; IV = 5; V = 7) using elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN). Open reduction was necessary in five cases, and additional immobilization was performed in 32 cases. Six complications occurred: loss of implant stability (n = 2), healing in malalignment, pseudarthrosis, radioulnar synostosis, and a persisting hypoesthesia at the thumb. As a result, two ESIN osteosynthesis were revised, and one radial head resection was performed. Loss of movement was seen in 11% of cases, overall Mayo elbow performance index (MEPI) was 99.8 (90–100), and none of the patients experienced negative impacts on activities of daily life. Conclusions Proximal radial fractures occur predominately without dislocation. Good results are obtained with conservative treatment throughout. In cases with displacement exceeding growth-related correction, ESIN is the undisputed treatment of choice. Open surgery and long immobilization periods should be avoided whenever possible.
Purpose ESIN (elastic stable intramedullary nailing) is considered the gold standard for various pediatric fractures. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and type of complications during or after TEN (titanium elastic nail) removal. Methods A retrospective data analysis was performed. Metal removal associated complications and preoperative extraosseous length/outlet angle of TENs as possible causes of complications were assessed. Results The complication rate in 384 TEN removals was 3.1% (n = 12). One major complication (rupture of M. extensor pollicis brevis) was documented. One refracture at the forearm occurred, however, remodeling prior TEN removal was completed. Ten minor complications were temporary or without irreversible restrictions (3 infections, 5 scaring/granuloma, 2 temporary paraesthesia). In 38 cases (16 forearms, 10 femora, 9 humeri, 3 lower legs), intra-operative fluoroscopy had to be used to locate the implants. In patients with forearm fractures, extraosseous implant length was relatively shorter than in cases without fluoroscopy (p = 0.01), but outlet angle of TENs was not significantly different in these two groups (28.5° vs 25.6°). In patients with femur fractures, extraosseous implant length and outlet angle were tendentially shorter, respectively, lower, but this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Removal of TENs after ESIN is a safe procedure with a low complication rate. Technically inaccurate TEN implantation makes removal more difficult and complicated. To prevent an untimely removal and patient discomfort, nail ends must be exactly positioned and cut. Intraoperative complications may be minimized with removal of TENs before signs of overgrowth. Evidence Level III, retrospective.
IntroductionInducing general anesthesia (GA) in children can considerably affect blood pressure, and the rate of severe critical events owing to this remains high. Cerebrovascular autoregulation (CAR) protects the brain against blood-flow-related injury. Impaired CAR may contribute to the risk of cerebral hypoxic–ischemic or hyperemic injury. However, blood pressure limits of autoregulation (LAR) in infants and children are unclear.Materials and methodsIn this pilot study CAR was monitored prospectively in 20 patients aged <4 years receiving elective surgery under GA. Cardiac- or neurosurgical procedures were excluded. The possibility of calculating the CAR index hemoglobin volume index (HVx), by correlating near-infrared-spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived relative cerebral tissue hemoglobin and invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was determined. Optimal MAP (MAPopt), LAR, and the proportion of time with a MAP outside LAR were determined.ResultsThe mean patient age was 14 ± 10 months. MAPopt could be determined in 19 of 20 patients, with an average of 62 ± 12 mmHg. The required time for a first MAPopt depended on the extent of spontaneous MAP fluctuations. The actual MAP was outside the LAR in 30% ± 24% of the measuring time. MAPopt significantly differed among patients with similar demographics. The CAR range averaged 19 ± 6 mmHg. Using weight-adjusted blood pressure recommendations or regional cerebral tissue saturation, only a fraction of the phases with inadequate MAP could be identified.ConclusionNon-invasive CAR monitoring using NIRS-derived HVx in infants, toddlers, and children receiving elective surgery under GA was reliable and provided robust data in this pilot study. Using a CAR-driven approach, individual MAPopt could be determined intraoperatively. The intensity of blood pressure fluctuations influences the initial measuring time. MAPopt may differ considerably from recommendations in the literature, and the MAP range within LAR in children may be smaller than that in adults. The necessity of manual artifact elimination represents a limitation. Larger prospective and multicenter cohort studies are necessary to confirm the feasibility of CAR-driven MAP management in children receiving major surgery under GA and to enable an interventional trial design using MAPopt as a target.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.