Introduction: 2–8% of all gastric cancer occurs at a younger age, also known as early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC). The aim of the present work was to use clinical registry data to classify and characterize the young cohort of patients with gastric cancer more precisely. Methods: German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers—Network for Care, Quality and Research in Oncology (ADT)was queried for patients with gastric cancer from 2000–2016. An approach that stratified relative distributions of histological subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma according to age percentiles was used to define and characterize EOGC. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment and survival were analyzed. Results: A total of 46,110 patients were included. Comparison of different groups of age with incidences of histological subtypes showed that incidence of signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) increased with decreasing age and exceeded pooled incidences of diffuse and intestinal type tumors in the youngest 20% of patients. We selected this group with median age of 53 as EOGC. The proportion of female patients was lower in EOGC than that of elderly patients (43% versus 45%; p < 0.001). EOGC presented more advanced and undifferentiated tumors with G3/4 stages in 77% versus 62%, T3/4 stages in 51% versus 48%, nodal positive tumors in 57% versus 53% and metastasis in 35% versus 30% (p < 0.001) and received less curative treatment (42% versus 52%; p < 0.001). Survival of EOGC was significantly better (five-years survival: 44% versus 31% (p < 0.0001), with age as independent predictor of better survival (HR 0.61; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: With this population-based registry study we were able to objectively define a cohort of patients referred to as EOGC. Despite more aggressive/advanced tumors and less curative treatment, survival was significantly better compared to elderly patients, and age was identified as an independent predictor for better survival.

Purpose To investigate the performance of radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in painful hip arthroplasty regarding loosening and arthroplasty survival. Methods Radiography and SPECT/CT reports of 249 painful hip arthroplasties of 191 patients were reviewed. Positive imaging was defined if loosening, infection, and polyethylene wear were found, indicating the need for arthroplasty exchange. Median time from radiograph to operation or last follow-up was 41.3 months (range 0.3–118.4 months). In 67 patients, the performance of radiographs and SPECT/CT regarding loosening was compared with an intraoperative reference standard. The time point of arthroplasty exchange was compared with imaging diagnosis and evaluated with Kaplan–Meier curves. Results Exchange of cup, shaft, or both was performed in 76 of 249 arthroplasties. Main diagnoses on SPECT/CT were loosening (n = 94), infection (n = 5), and polyethylene wear (n = 15). In total, 104 patients were SPECT/CT positive compared to 84 patients on radiography. Five-year survival of arthroplasties for radiograph positive and negative arthroplasties was 41.5%/83.4% and 39.3%/90.7% for SPECT/CT, respectively. Prognostic impact regarding arthroplasty exchange was highest in radiograph and SPECT/CT concordant positive patients (hazard ratio 19.7 as compared to radiograph and SPECT/CT negative patients). Sensitivity and specificity in 67 operated patients regarding shaft loosening were 59.4%/80.0% with radiography, 90.6%/68.6% with SPECT/CT (P = 0.002 for sensitivity and P = 0.29 for specificity), and for cup loosening 47.4%/89.6% with radiography and 63.2%/85.4% with SPECT/CT (P = 0.51, respectively, P = 0.63). Conclusion In patients with painful hip arthroplasty, positive radiography, and SPECT/CT are associated with poorer arthroplasty survival. Performance regarding loosening is slightly better with SPECT/CT.

Chirurgische Eingriffe am Magen können mit einer Veränderung der Anatomie sowie der Nahrungsmittelpassage einhergehen. Diese Eingriffe können verschiedene operationsbedingte Folgen, Syndrome sowie Symptome nach sich ziehen, welche unter Berücksichtigung der onkologischen und bariatrischen Chirurgie teilweise unerwünschte sowie erwünschte Effekte hervorrufen.

No abstract

Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare mesenchymal tumors. They are most frequently located in the stomach but are also found in the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Information regarding the prognostic factors associated with upper gastrointestinal GIST is still scarse. Methods In this study, datasets provided by the German Clinical Cancer Registry Group, including a total of 93,069 patients with malignant tumors in the upper GI tract (C15, C16) between 2000 and 2016 were analyzed to investigate clinical outcomes of GIST in the entire upper GI tract. Results We identified 1361 patients with GIST of the upper GI tract. Tumors were located in the esophagus in 37(2.7%) patients, at the GEJ in 70 (5.1%) patients, and in the stomach in 1254 (91.2%) patients. The incidence of GIST increased over time, reaching 5% of all UGI tumors in 2015. The median age was 69 years. The incidence of GIST was similar between males and females (53% vs 47%, respectively). However, the proportion of GIST in female patients increased continuously with advancing age, ranging from 34.7% (41–50 years) to 71.4% (91–100 years). Male patients were twice as likely to develop tumors in the esophagus and GEJ compared to females (3.4% vs. 1.9% and 6.7% vs. 3.4%, respectively). The median overall survival of upper gastrointestinal GIST was 129 months. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS was 93%, 79%, and 52% respectively. Nevertheless, tumors located in the esophagus and GEJ were associated with shorter OS compared to gastric GIST (130 vs. 111 months, p = 0.001). The incidence of documented distant metastasis increased with more proximal location of GIST (gastric vs. GEJ vs. esophagus: 13% vs. 16% vs. 27%) at presentation. Conclusion GIST of the esophagus and GEJ are rare soft tissue sarcomas with increasing incidence in Germany. They are characterized by worse survival outcomes and increased risk of metastasis compared to gastric GIST.