Applicability and accuracy of the rapidly developing tools and workflows for image-guided radiotherapy need to be validated under realistic treatment-like conditions. We present the construction of the ADAM-pelvis phantom, an anthropomorphic, deformable and multimodal (CT and MRI) phantom of the male pelvis. The phantom covers patient-like uncertainties in image-guided radiotherapy workflows including imaging artifacts for the special case of the human anatomy as well as organ motion.Principles and methods were further improved from previous work. The phantom includes surrogates for muscle tissue, adipose, inner and outer bone, as well as deformable silicone organs. Anthropomorphic shapes are realized with 3D-printing techniques for the bone and the construction of the hollow silicone organ shells. Organs are constructed from patient image segmentation and further guided by reported deformation models. Imaging markers and pockets for dosimeters are included in the organ shells.The improved phantom surrogates match imaging characteristics in MRI (T1 and T2 relaxation time) and CT (Hounsfield units) of human tissues. The surrogates are suited for long term use (several months) of the phantom. Previously reported artifacts of the muscle surrogate were avoided by improved composition of the used agarose gel. Interfractional organ motion is successfully realized for the water filled bladder and the air filled rectum and showed to be reproducible with deviation below 1 mm. Volume variations of both induce displacement, rotation and deformation of the prostate.We present solutions for the construction of an anthropomorphic phantom suitable for MRI and CT imaging including deformable organs. The developed concepts of phantom surrogates and construction techniques were successfully applied in building the ADAM-pelvis phantom and can as well be adopted for other anthropomorphic phantoms. The presented phantom allows for the systematic and controlled investigation of image-guided radiotherapy workflows in presence of organ motion. NOTEOriginal content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence.

BackgroundTo analyse the frequency of re-planning and its variability dependent on the IGRT correction strategy and on the modification of the dosimetric criteria for re-planning for the spinal cord in head and neck IG-IMRT.MethodsDaily kV-control-CTs of six head and neck patients (=175 CTs) were analysed. All volumes of interest were re-contoured using deformable image registration. Three IGRT correction strategies were simulated and the resulting dose distributions were computed for all fractions. Different sets of criteria with varying dose thresholds for re-planning were investigated. All sets of criteria ensure equivalent target coverage of both CTVs, but vary in the tolerance threshold of the spinal cord.ResultsThe variations of the D95 and D2 in respect to the planned values ranged from -7% to +3% for both CTVs, and -2% to +6% for the spinal cord. Despite different correction vectors of the three IGRT strategies, the dosimetric differences were small. The number of fractions not requiring re-planning varied between 0% and 11% dependent on the applied IGRT correction strategy. In contrast, this number ranged between 32% and 70% dependent on the dosimetric thresholds, even though these thresholds were only gently modified.ConclusionsThe more precise the planned dose needs to be maintained over the treatment course, the more frequently re-planning is required. The influence of different IGRT correction strategies, even though geometrically notable, was found to be of only limited relevance for the re-planning frequency. In contrast, the definition and modification of thresholds for re-planning have a major impact on the re-planning frequency.

PurposeIntensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of head and neck tumors allows a precise conformation of the high-dose region to clinical target volumes (CTVs) while respecting dose limits to organs a risk (OARs). Accurate patient setup reduces translational and rotational deviations between therapy planning and therapy delivery days. However, uncertainties in the shape of the CTV and OARs due to e.g. small pose variations in the highly deformable anatomy of the head and neck region can still compromise the dose conformation. Routinely applied safety margins around the CTV cause higher dose deposition in adjacent healthy tissue and should be kept as small as possible.Materials and MethodsIn this work we evaluate and compare three approaches for margin generation 1) a clinically used approach with a constant isotropic 3 mm margin, 2) a previously proposed approach adopting a spatial model of the patient and 3) a newly developed approach adopting a biomechanical model of the patient. All approaches are retrospectively evaluated using a large patient cohort of over 500 fraction control CT images with heterogeneous pose changes. Automatic methods for finding landmark positions in the control CT images are combined with a patient specific biomechanical finite element model to evaluate the CTV deformation.ResultsThe applied methods for deformation modeling show that the pose changes cause deformations in the target region with a mean motion magnitude of 1.80 mm. We found that the CTV size can be reduced by both variable margin approaches by 15.6% and 13.3% respectively, while maintaining the CTV coverage. With approach 3 an increase of target coverage was obtained.ConclusionVariable margins increase target coverage, reduce risk to OARs and improve healthy tissue sparing at the same time.