Background: Most studies carried out in Latin America have shown greater rates of epilepsy and generalized seizures than those observed in developed countries, in spite of lower numbers of patients receiving treatment. To date, studies in Argentina have been insufficient to establish true prevalence. Objective: To determine the prevalence of epilepsy in primary school children in Buenos Aires, together with rates of different seizure types, treatments prescribed, diagnoses made and number of inadequate therapies administered, as well as the relationship between epilepsy and learning difficulties. Design and Method: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 10% of the entire primary school population of Buenos Aires through randomized, systematic, representative and conglomerate sampling of public and private school students. A total of 26,270 responses were received (83.1% of the population) to a specially designed questionnaire, with 96.4% sensitivity and 41.5% specificity, respectively. Interviews were conducted in all probable epilepsy cases as well as in a random sample of probable negative ones. Results: Eighty-four children with epilepsy were detected (lifetime prevalence 3.2‰; active prevalence 2.6‰), in whom generalized seizures predominated (57.1%). Ninety-three percent of cases diagnosed were currently under, or had previously received antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. Almost 1% of the primary school population studied had a prior diagnosis and/or received AED for dysrhythmia or epilepsy. The percentage of grade repeaters in the general population and in children with epilepsy was 8.4 and 26.2%, respectively. Conclusions: (1) The prevalence of epilepsy in primary school children in Buenos Aires is similar to that reported for developed countries; (2) a slight prevalence for generalized seizures was observed; (3) 93% of cases received AEDs; (4) misdiagnoses and unnecessary treatments exceeded correct diagnoses and adequate therapy, and (5) disease presence and/or treatment were associated with poorer school performance.
Background: Previous studies in special schools have shown a high prevalence of epilepsy, which is strongly associated with cerebral palsy and severe mental retardation. The conditions regulating school placement have also been described in those studies. In the City of Buenos Aires, information is known only for mainstream schools. Objective: To determine the prevalence and characteristics of epilepsy in special schools and to compare results with common primary education settings. Design and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in special schools in the City of Buenos Aires, by adopting the same definitions, diagnostic criteria and questionnaire as those used in a previous study in the common primary school population. Responses from 1,682 children, aged 6–16 years, residing in the City of Buenos Aires, with mental retardation, visual or hearing impairment, psychiatric disorders and motor disabilities were analyzed. Results: A total of 121 children with epilepsy were detected. Lifetime prevalence was 71.9‰ and active prevalence was 64.8‰ (22–25 times greater than rates in mainstream schools). Prevalence was highest in girls and generalized seizures prevailed over other seizure types. Ninety-two percent of cases received antiepileptic drugs, 57.9% as a single drug treatment and 85.1% in adequate doses. Only 56% of the children with a diagnosis of epilepsy proved to be true-positive cases, and almost 40% received antiepileptic drugs for nonepileptic disorders. Malformations/degenerative disease were the most common etiology. Conclusions: Special schools contain clusters of children with epilepsy as a comorbid condition. False high frequency is due to misdiagnoses and unnecessary treatments. These schools are an important target for educational interventions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.