Oral corticosteroid therapy remains the most common treatment for pyoderma gangrenosum associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Biologic therapies such as infliximab and adalimumab should also be considered.

Background and Aims Clinical trials and real-life studies with ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD) have shown a good efficacy and safety profile. However, these data are scarcely available in elderly patients. Therefore, we aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in elderly patients with CD. Methods Elderly patients (>60 years old) from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with ustekinumab due to CD were included. Every patient was matched with two controls under 60 years of age, according to anti-TNF use and smoking habit. Values for the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI), endoscopic activity, C-reactive protein (CRP), and faecal calprotectin (FC) were recorded at baseline and at weeks 16, 32 and 54. Results 648 patients were included, 212 elderlies. Effectiveness was similar between young and elderly patients during the follow-up. Steroid-free remision was similar at week 16 (54.6 vs 51.4%, p=0.20), 32 (53.0% vs 54.5%, p=0.26) and 54 (57.8% vs 51.1%, p=0.21). Persistence of ustekinumab as maintenance therapy was similar in both age groups (log-rank test; p=0.91). There was no difference in the rate of adverse effects (14.2% vs 11.2%, p=0.350), including severe infections (7.1% vs 7.3%, p=1.00), except for the occurrence of de novo neoplasms, which was higher in older patients (0.7% vs 4.3%, p= 0.003). Conclusions Ustekinumab is as effective in elderly patients with CD, as it is in non-elderly. Safety profile seems to be also similar but for a higher rate of de novo neoplasms, probably related to the age of the elderly patients.

Nonetheless, our understanding of IBD and intestinal inflammation may increase significantly after further investigation into ACE2 and its effects, potentially leading to new treatments for these conditions, and providing us with opportunities in the context of this tragic global pandemic.

Background Clinical trials and real-life studies with Ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease show its good efficacy and safety profile. However, there are hardly any data on elderly patients, who are excluded from these clinical trials. Our aim is to evaluate these variables in real-life practice. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with Ustekinumab for Crohn’s disease. Elderly patients were selected as those over 60 years old at the start of treatment. They were compared with 2 randomised controls from the same centre, aged less than 60 years, matched for smoking habit. The degree of comorbidity was assessed using the Charlson’s index. Clinical and biochemical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Harvey-Bradshaw index and calprotectin and CRP levels at weeks 16, 32 and 54, when available. Results A total of 648 patients were analysed, 212 elderly (mean age 67 [63.6;72.8] years) and 436 young (mean age 41.6 [32.6;50.0] years). No differences were observed between both groups in baseline variables except for the degree of comorbidity, higher in elderly patients (1.00 [0.00;2.00] vs 0.00 [0.00;0.00], p<0.001) and previous anti-TNF use, lower in the elderly (3.44% vs 15.2%, p<0.001). Baseline clinical and biochemical activity was similar in both groups. Clinical response rate was similar in both groups at week 16 (70.5% vs 76.6%, p=0.199), week 32 (67.6% vs 70.2% p=0.104) and week 54 (74% vs 74.9%, p=0.326). Steroid-free remission and biochemical response also showed no differences throughout follow-up. The rate of adverse effects was similar in both groups (14.2% vs 11.2%, p=0.350) except for the occurrence of de novo neoplasms, which was higher in the elderly group (0.69% vs 4.25%, p=0.003). The rate of severe infections (7.08 vs 7.34, p=1.000), the need for surgery (16.5% vs 20.0%, p=0.345) and the need for hospital admission (21.7% vs 19.0%, p=0.489) did not differ. Persistence of UST treatment was similar in both groups (log Rank test p=0.91). Conclusion Ustekinumab achieved clinical response in almost three-quarters of elderly patients, similar to the younger population, with no increase in the rate of infections or other adverse effects, with the exception of de novo neoplasms.

Introduction:The possibility of developing idiopathic portal hypertension has been described with thiopurine treatment despite compromises the prognosis of these patients, the fact its true prevalence is unknown.Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a cohort of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients followed at our unit, to determine the prevalence of diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) and its relationship with thiopurine treatment.Results: At the time of the analysis, 927/1,419 patients were under treatment with thiopurine drugs (65%). A total of 4 patients with IBD type Crohn's disease with idiopathic portal hypertension probably related to the thiopurine treatment were identified (incidence of 4.3 cases per 1,000). Seventy-five percent of patients started with signs or symptoms of portal hypertension. Only one patient was asymptomatic but the diagnosis of IPH because of isolated thrombocytopenia is suspected. However, note that all patients had thrombocytopenia previously. Abdominal ultrasound with fibroscan, hepatic vein catheterization and liver biopsy were performed on all of them as part of the etiology of portal hypertension. In the abdominal ultrasound, indirect portal hypertension data were observed in all patients (as splenomegaly) cirrhosis was also ruled out. The fibroscan data showed significant liver fibrosis (F2-F3).Conclusion: Idiopathic portal hypertension following thiopurine treatment in IBD patients is a rare occurrence, but it must be borne in mind in the differential diagnosis for early diagnosis, especially in patients undergoing thiopurine treatment over a long period. The presence of thrombocytopenia is often the only predictor of its development in the preclinical stage.