Background Standard treatment for glioblastoma is radiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for 6 cycles, although the optimal number of cycles of adjuvant temozolomide has long been a subject of debate. We performed a phase II randomized trial investigating whether extending adjuvant temozolomide for more than 6 cycles improved outcome. Methods Glioblastoma patients treated at 20 Spanish hospitals who had not progressed after 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide were centrally randomized to stop (control arm) or continue (experimental arm) temozolomide up to a total of 12 cycles at the same doses they were receiving in cycle 6. Patients were stratified by MGMT methylation and measurable disease. The primary endpoint was differences in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02209948). Results From August 2014 to November 2018, 166 patients were screened, 7 of whom were ineligible. Seventy-nine patients were included in the stop arm and 80 in the experimental arm. All patients were included in the analyses of outcomes and of safety. There were no differences in 6-month PFS (control 55.7%; experimental 61.3%), PFS, or OS between arms. MGMT methylation and absence of measurable disease were independent factors of better outcome. Patients in the experimental arm had more lymphopenia (P < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001), and nausea and vomiting (P = 0.001). Conclusions Continuing temozolomide after 6 adjuvant cycles is associated with greater toxicity but confers no additional benefit in 6-month PFS. Key Points 1. Extending adjuvant temozolomide to 12 cycles did not improve 6-month PFS. 2. Extending adjuvant temozolomide did not improve PFS or OS in any patient subset. 3. Extending adjuvant temozolomide was linked to increased toxicities.

No abstract

Background Outcomes are poorer in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with BRAF V600E mutations than those without it, but the effect of these mutations on treatment response is unclear. This real-world study assessed the effects of antiangiogenic-based treatment and systemic inflammatory factors on outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC. Methods This real-world, multicenter, retrospective, observational study included patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC treated in eight hospitals in Spain. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were also assessed. The effect of first- and second-line treatment type on OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR were evaluated, plus the impact of systemic inflammatory markers on these outcomes. A systemic inflammation score (SIS) of 1–3 was assigned based on one point each for platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥200, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3, and serum albumin < 3.6 g/dL. Results Of 72 patients, data from 64 were analyzed. After a median of 69.1 months, median OS was 11.9 months and median first-line PFS was 4.4 months. First-line treatment was triplet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (12.5%), doublet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (47.2%), doublet chemotherapy-anti-EGFR (11.1%), or doublet chemotherapy (18.1%). Although first-line treatment showed no significant effect on OS, antiangiogenic-based regimens were associated with prolonged median PFS versus non-antiangiogenic regimens. Negative predictors of survival with antiangiogenic-based treatment were NLR, serum albumin, and SIS 1–3, but not PLR. Patients with SIS 1–3 showed significantly prolonged PFS with antiangiogenic-based treatment versus non-antiangiogenic-based treatment, while those with SIS=0 showed no PFS benefit. Conclusions Antiangiogenic-based regimens, SIS, NLR, and albumin were predictors of survival in patients with mCRC, while SIS, NLR and serum albumin may predict response to antiangiogenic-based chemotherapy. Trial registration GIT-BRAF-2017-01.

This study has shown that FTM is safe and has a comparable activity with other available therapeutic options of use in the treatment of recurrent HGG.

126 Background: BRAFV600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a poor prognosis. The BEACON trial demonstrated an improvement in tumor response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) when administering encorafenib-cetuximab (EC) to patients (pts) who progressed after 1 or 2 therapy lines. This study provides a retrospective analysis of the effectiveness and safety of EC in the real-world setting in Spain. Methods: This retrospective analysis included BRAFV600E mCRC pts treated with EC in 2nd line treatment, recruited from March to July 2022. The Co-primary study endpoints included effectiveness based on PFS and OS. Secondary endpoints included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients before EC initiation, overall response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: From March to July 2022, 81 evaluable pts were included. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are displayed.A median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 6.0 (4.0-13.0) cycles of encorafenib and 6.0 (4.0-14.5) cycles of cetuximab were administered. Median treatment duration was 4.4 (2.6-7.8) months (m) and 4.4 m (2.8-7.6) respectively. The ORR and disease control rate was 33.8 % (CI 95% 23.4-45.5) and 68.8 (CI 95% 57.3 – 78.9) respectively. One (1.2%) pt achieved complete response At data cut-offwith a 9.7 median follow-up, 50 (61.7%) pts had died, all of them due to disease progression. Median (95% Confidence Interval, CI) OS was 12.6 m (8.0-17.3) and median PFS was 5.0 m (3.8-6.2). The 12-m OS and 12-m PFS rates were 54.6% (95% CI, 43.3-65.9) and 19.9% (10.5-29.3) respectively. Pts with neutrophils/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3 had worse OS (HR, 1.8 95% CI 1.0-3.2; p < 0.049) and worse PFS (HR, 2.3, 1.4-3.8; p < 0.002). Disease progression (86.7%) was the most frequent cause of treatment discontinuation, followed by unacceptable AEs (3.7%). Eleven pts (13.5%) experienced treatment-related graded 3 or 4 AEs, mainly acne (3.7%). Treatment-related deaths were not reported. Conclusions: This study provides real-world data of BRAFV600E mCRC pts treated with EC combination in routine clinical practice in Spain. EC effectiveness and safety were consistent with the results obtained in clinical trials. [Table: see text]