We have estimated the average annual cost per patient with DMD in eight European countries adopting a social perspective, and to our knowledge this is the first study with such a wide perspective. The results on costs show a considerable gap between Eastern and Western European countries. Non-healthcare costs range from 64 to 89 % of overall costs and informal care is to a great extent the main driver of this cost category. The HRQOL of people with DMD is much lower than that of the general population.

We have shown that haemophilia is associated with a substantial economic burden and impaired HRQOL. Studies on cost of illness and HRQOL are important for haemophilia as the future of this disease is likely to change with the development of new innovative treatments. The introduction of these treatments will most likely impact future costs related to haemophilia.

No abstract

Background: Cri du Chat syndrome (CdC) is a rare disease caused by the deletion on the short arm of the chromosome 5, with an incidence of 1:15,000 to 1:50,000 live-born infants. No study at international level has assessed the costs, Quality of Life (QoL) and Disability through standardized quantitative tools. The aim is to estimate economic costs related to CdC from a societal perspective, to assess the QoL and Disability in patients with CdC along with their caregivers in Italy. Methods: A cross-sectional study of patients with Cri du Chat in Italy was carried out. A cost of illness approach from a societal perspective was used to estimate cost, and a micro-costing method was adopted. The QoL was measured with EuroQol 5-domain (EQ-5D) questionnaire and Disability by using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 36 item (WHODAS 2.0). Results: A total of 76 questionnaires were collected from caregivers taking care of 40 adult patients and 36 minor patients. All patients need a carer and the principal caregiver is commonly informal carer or a family member (93%). The EQ-5D VAS score for patients is 65.5 (SD = 22.4) out of 100; while the most important compromised areas of QoL are usual activities and self-care. The overall WHODAS 2.0 score is 65% (0 = no disability; 100 = full disability). The average annual cost of a patient with Cri du Chat in our population is €87,856.24; the main cost item of patients with Cri du Chat syndrome is informal care (i.e., €76,981.69 yearly) since it constitutes the 87% of total costs. Results highlight the burden of CdC in terms of its impact on QoL and Disability for patients and caregivers in Italy, with a score much lower than that of general population. The disease is associated with considerable costs of informal care. Conclusions: Cri du Chat syndrome was found to be linked with a significant socioeconomic impact which is dominated by direct non-healthcare informal costs.

Background/Aims: National Plans for Rare Diseases (RDs) are the common denominator of current public health policy concerns on RDs across the EU. With the aim of a better distribution of the available resources, they conjugate the European objective that aims at ensuring that patients with RDs have access to high-quality care - including diagnostics, treatment and rehabilitation - with the national priorities of selecting specific measures for adoption and implementation. Methods: The European Project for Rare Diseases National Plans Development (EUROPLAN, www.europlanproject.eu) is cofunded by the EU Commission (DG-SANCO) and is coordinated by the Italian National Center for Rare Diseases of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS). The EUROPLAN goal is to promote the implementation of National Plans or Strategies to tackle RDs and share relevant experiences within countries, linking national efforts, through a common strategy at a European level. In order to fulfill these objectives, EUROPLAN involved health authorities, clinicians, scientists, the European Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), and many other patient groups as associated and collaborating partners from several European countries. Results: The project was launched in 2008 and foresaw 2 implementation phases: phase 1 (2008-2011) to build the consensus definition of operational tools (recommendations and indicators), and the ongoing phase 2 (2012-2015), mainly aimed at capacity building with the proactive involvement of multilevel stakeholders. EUROPLAN is facilitating and accelerating the implementation of National Plans in almost all EU and several non-EU Countries. Conclusions: EUROPLAN is a European and an international process more than a project, and it could be defined as a ‘litmus test' demonstrating how the collaboration between institutions and patients' associations can accelerate the process of awareness and development of policies and actions.