BackgroundRecent reports suggest that vitamin B1 (thiamine) participates in the processes underlying plant adaptations to certain types of abiotic and biotic stress, mainly oxidative stress. Most of the genes coding for enzymes involved in thiamine biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana have been identified. In our present study, we examined the expression of thiamine biosynthetic genes, of genes encoding thiamine diphosphate-dependent enzymes and the levels of thiamine compounds during the early (sensing) and late (adaptation) responses of Arabidopsis seedlings to oxidative, salinity and osmotic stress. The possible roles of plant hormones in the regulation of the thiamine contribution to stress responses were also explored.ResultsThe expression of Arabidopsis genes involved in the thiamine diphosphate biosynthesis pathway, including that of THI1, THIC, TH1 and TPK, was analyzed for 48 h in seedlings subjected to NaCl or sorbitol treatment. These genes were found to be predominantly up-regulated in the early phase (2-6 h) of the stress response. The changes in these gene transcript levels were further found to correlate with increases in thiamine and its diphosphate ester content in seedlings, as well as with the enhancement of gene expression for enzymes which require thiamine diphosphate as a cofactor, mainly α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, pyruvate dehydrogenase and transketolase. In the case of the phytohormones including the salicylic, jasmonic and abscisic acids which are known to be involved in plant stress responses, only abscisic acid was found to significantly influence the expression of thiamine biosynthetic genes, the thiamine diphosphate levels, as well as the expression of genes coding for main thiamine diphosphate-dependent enzymes. Using Arabidopsis mutant plants defective in abscisic acid production, we demonstrate that this phytohormone is important in the regulation of THI1 and THIC gene expression during salt stress but that the regulatory mechanisms underlying the osmotic stress response are more complex.ConclusionsOn the basis of the obtained results and earlier reported data, a general model is proposed for the involvement of the biosynthesis of thiamine compounds and thiamine diphosphate-dependent enzymes in abiotic stress sensing and adaptation processes in plants. A possible regulatory role of abscisic acid in the stress sensing phase is also suggested by these data.
Monodisperse silver nanoparticle sols were synthesized via chemical reduction processes in aqueous environment without using polymeric stabilizing agents or surfactants. The sols obtained using various reducing agents; inorganic cell permeabilizers and organic phenolic compounds; inter alia gallic acid (GA) and tannin (TA) were thoroughly characterized by various physicochemical methods such as TEM, SEM, AFM, DLS and micro-electrophoresis. The antibacterial activity of the sols against two E. coli strains was characterized via the determination of the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC). All sols exhibited a pronounced bactericidal effect against the standard K12 strain, especially the GA and TA sols showing MBC concentration as low as 1-5 mg L(-1). In the case of the antibiotic resistant strain the highest activity (MBC of 10 mg L(-1)) was observed for the sol synthesized using sodium hypophosphate and sodium tripolyphosphate. Additionally, interactions of silver nanoparticles with bacteria cell were studied using TEM and AFM imaging. It was shown that the silver particles attach to the bacteria surface inducing disintegration, which enables their penetration inside the bacteria. Our measurements confirmed that the surface chemistry of silver nanoparticles can play a decisive role.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.