This post-hoc study was aimed at assessing whether disease severity was higher in a sample of Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia patients (TRS) compared to schizophrenia patients responsive to antipsychotics (non-TRS). Determinants of disease severity were also investigated in these groups. Eligible patients were screened by standardized diagnostic algorithm to categorize them as TRS or non-TRS. All patients underwent the following assessments: CGI-S; PANSS; DAI; NES; a battery of cognitive tests. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were also recorded. TRS patients exhibited significantly higher disease severity and psychotic symptoms, either as PANSS total score or subscales' scores. A preliminary correlation analysis ruled out clinical and cognitive variables not associated with disease severity in the two groups. Hierarchical linear regression showed that negative symptoms were the clinical variable explaining the highest part of variation in disease severity in TRS, while in non-TRS patients PANSS-General Psychopathology was the variable explaining the highest variation. Mediation analysis showed that negative symptoms mediate the effects of verbal fluency dysfunctions and high-level neurological soft signs (NSS) on TRS' disease severity. These results show that determinants of disease severity sharply differ in TRS and non-TRS patients, and let hypothesize that TRS may stem from cognitive disfunctions and putatively neurodevelopmental aberrations.

Aim Early age at schizophrenia onset (EOS) has been associated with a worse clinical course, although previous studies reported substantial heterogeneity. Despite the relevance of the subject, the relationship between the age of onset and treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is less clear. Methods We screened 197 non‐affective psychotic patients. Of these, 99 suffered from schizophrenia and were putative TRS and were included in a prospective 4‐to‐8‐week trial to assess their response to antipsychotics. According to status (TRS/nonTRS) and age‐at‐onset (early: ≤18 years, EOS; adult: >18 years, adult onset schizophrenia [AOS]) patients were subdivided in EOS‐TRS, EOS‐nonTRS, AOS‐TRS, AOS‐nonTRS. Multiple clinical variables were measured and compared by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), using age as a covariate. Two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess whether significant differences were attributable to TRS status or age‐at‐onset. Results The rate of TRS patients was significantly higher in EOS compared to AOS. At the ANCOVA, EOS‐TRS had significantly worse clinical, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes compared to the other groups. Overall, EOS‐TRS were more impaired than EOS‐nonTRS, while significant differences with AOS‐TRS were less consistent, albeit appreciable. Two‐way ANOVA demonstrated that, in the majority of the investigated variables, the significant differences among groups were attributable to the TRS status effect rather than to age‐at‐onset or combined effects. Conclusions These results suggest that refractoriness to antipsychotics may be strongly linked to the early onset of psychotic symptoms, possibly as a result of common neurobiology.

No abstract

No abstract