No abstract

Purpose: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend adjuvant chemotherapy after curative-intent surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Studies have shown variable rates of adherence to adjuvant therapy CPGs. This study sought to determine the proportion of patients in Nova Scotia receiving CPG-concordant adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 weeks of surgery for CRC in 2001 to 2005, and to identify factors associated with chemotherapy receipt beyond 12 weeks from surgery or chemotherapy nonreceipt. Methods: Patients with stages IIB or III colon or stages II or IIIrectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgery in Nova Scotia were identified through the provincial cancer registry and anonymously linked to 14 administrative health databases. Chart review was conducted to obtain chemotherapy data and reasons for chemotherapy nonreceipt. Logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with receipt of chemotherapy and meeting the 12-week benchmark (P Ͻ .05).Results: A total of 1,151 patients were identified, of whom 59% received chemotherapy. Factors predicting chemotherapy receipt were male sex, age Ͻ 75 years, no hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery, stage III disease, no prior cancer diagnosis, and rectal cancer. Of the 679 patients who received chemotherapy, 479 (72%) met the 12-week benchmark, with male sex, urban residence, less social deprivation, colon cancer and increased length of hospital stay as significant factors. Of the 472 patients who did not receive chemotherapy, the most common reason for nonreceipt was no consultation with a medical oncologist (53%). Conclusion:A number of factors influence adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy CPGs for CRC and should be incorporated in future work as novel regimens enter clinical practice.

Objective: Among mental health outcome measures that have been developed for routine use, most of the information concerns the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). This instrument is widely used in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, but not in Canada. We tested its sensitivity and predictive validity under conditions that would resemble, as closely as possible, routine use. Method: Treating clinicians were asked to assess patients of all ages referred to outpatient mental health facilities of 2 district health authorities in Nova Scotia using either the HoNOS for adults or the HoNOS for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). Data were entered using the existing routine administrative data system. Results: We obtained at least 1 rating on 4620 patients, giving a completion rate of 82%. On follow-up, ratings for the global score and most of the individual items were sensitive to change (n = 808). After adjusting for confounders, a baseline HoNOS score was significantly associated with subsequent in and outpatient service use including admissions, bed days, and psychiatric contacts (n = 1359). Conclusions: HoNOS has satisfactory sensitivity and predictive validity for routine use. We could introduce the adult version and HoNOSCA simultaneously and collect data using routine databases. Given the widespread routine use of HoNOS internationally, using the same outcome measure in Canada would enable comparisons of illness severity and outcomes between jurisdictions.