Esta investigación presenta como objetivo el análisis etnográfico de las prácticas discentes y docentes vinculadas al desarrollo innovador de la lectura y el comentario argumentativo de textos multimodales en estudiantes de la asignatura Lectura, Escritura y Argumentación (LEA), de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad El Bosque (Bogotá). Desde un enfoque constructivista, se ha aplicado una metodología mixta, con énfasis en el componente microetnográfico, en el contexto del aula, por medio de encuesta de autopercepción lectora y de prueba de lectura construida ad hoc para caracterizar al grupo de estudiantes objeto de esta investigación. Como complemento a lo anterior, se ha realizado observación en el aula con registro en el diario de campo, así como entrevistas al decano de la Facultad, a los discentes y a los docentes. El análisis de los comentarios con rúbrica de evaluación y con el programa Nvivo, así como la triangulación de todos los datos recogidos, han puesto de manifiesto las diferencias y deficiencias en la comprensión lectora y la escritura de los estudiantes en los comentarios argumentativos. Igualmente, se ha comprobado la relación determinante que tales competencias comunicativas ejercen sobre la capacidad argumentativa. Como consecuencia, se propone el reto didáctico de mejorar el comentario argumentativo de textos multimodales con estrategias intertextuales útiles para desarrollar las competencias comunicativas y fortalecer la formación biopsicosocial y cultural de los futuros médicos From an ethnographic perspective, this study aims to explore (i) the learning and teaching practices that are linked to the innovative development of reading; and (ii) the argumentative commentary of multimodal texts produced by students enrolled in the Reading, Writing and Argumentation subject (LEA for its abbreviation in Spanish), at the School of Medicine of Universidad El Bosque (Bogotá). From a constructivist approach, a mixed methodology was applied, with a focus on the microethnographic component, within a classroom context, through a self-perception reading survey, and a constructed ad hoc reading test to characterize the group of students. Besides, class observations were included in a field diary and interviews conducted with the dean of the School, the students and the lecturers. The analysis of comments with an evaluation rubric and the Nvivo program, as well as the triangulation of all the collected data, revealed differences and deficiencies in students’ reading comprehension and argumentative writings. Likewise, the relationship that such communicative competence exert on the students’ argumentative capacity was verified. As a consequence, the didactic challenge of improving the argumentative commentary of multimodal texts with useful intertextual strategies is proposed as a way to develop communication skills and strengthen the biopsychosocial and cultural training of future doctors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.