Purpose Animal models are an indispensable tool for developing and testing new clinical applications regarding the treatment of acute injuries and chronic diseases of the knee joint. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the anatomy of the intra-articular structures of the human knee to species commonly used in large animal research studies. Methods Fresh frozen cow (n=4), sheep (n=3), goat (n=4), dog (n=4), pig (n=5), rabbit (n=5), and human (n=4) cadaveric knees were used. Passive range of motion and intra-articular structure sizes of the knees were measured, the structure sizes normalized to the tibial plateau, and compared among the species. Results Statistically significant differences in the range of motion and intra-articular structure sizes were found among all the species. Only the human knee was able to attain full extension. After normalization, only the pig ACL was significantly longer than the human counterpart. The tibial insertion site of the ACL was split by the anterior lateral meniscus attachment in the cow, sheep, and pig knees. The sheep PCL had two distinct tibial insertion sites, while all the other knees had only one. Furthermore, only in human knees, both lateral meniscal attachments were located more centrally than the medial meniscal attachments. Conclusions/Clinical Relevance Despite the relatively preserved dimensions of the cruciate ligaments, menisci, and intercondylar notch amongst human and animals, structural differences in the cruciate ligament attachment sites and morphology of the menisci between humans and animals are important to consider when selecting an animal model.
Background While ACL reconstruction is the treatment gold standard for ACL injury, it does not reduce the risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Therefore, new treatments that minimize this postoperative complication are of interest. Bio-enhanced ACL repair, in which a bioactive scaffold is used to stimulate healing of an ACL transection, has shown considerable promise in short term studies. The long-term results of this technique and the effects of the bio-enhancement on the articular cartilage have not been previously evaluated in a large animal model. Hypothesis 1) The structural (tensile) properties of the porcine ACL at 6 and 12 months after injury are similar when treated with bio-enhanced ACL repair, bio-enhanced ACL reconstruction, or conventional ACL reconstruction, and all treatments yield results superior to untreated ACL transection. 2) After one year, macroscopic cartilage damage following bio-enhanced ACL repair is similar to bio-enhanced ACL reconstruction and less than conventional ACL reconstruction and untreated ACL transection. Study Design Controlled laboratory study (porcine model) Methods Sixty-two Yucatan mini-pigs underwent ACL transection and randomization to four experimental groups: 1) no treatment, 2) conventional ACL reconstruction, 3) “bio-enhanced” ACL reconstruction using a bioactive scaffold, and 4) “bio-enhanced” ACL repair using a bioactive scaffold. The biomechanical properties of the ligament or graft and macroscopic assessments of the cartilage surfaces were performed after 6 and 12 months of healing. Results The structural properties (i.e., linear stiffness, yield and maximum loads) of the ligament following bio-enhanced ACL repair were not significantly different from bio-enhanced ACL reconstruction or conventional ACL reconstruction, but were significantly greater than untreated ACL transection after 12 months of healing. Macroscopic cartilage damage after bio-enhanced ACL repair was significantly less than untreated ACL transection and bio-enhanced ACL reconstruction, and there was a strong trend (p=.068) that it was less than conventional ACL reconstruction in the porcine model at 12 months. Conclusions Bio-enhanced ACL repair produces a ligament that is biomechanically similar to an ACL graft and provides chondroprotection to the joint following ACL surgery. Clinical Relevance Bio-enhanced ACL repair may provide a new less invasive treatment option that reduces cartilage damage following joint injury.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.