Experimental evidence suggests that microfilaments and microtubules play contrasting roles in regulating the balance between motility and stability in neuronal structures. Actin-containing microfilaments are associated with structural plasticity, both during development when their dynamic activity drives the exploratory activity of growth cones and after circuit formation when the actin-rich dendritic spines of excitatory synapses retain a capacity for rapid changes in morphology. By contrast, microtubules predominate in axonal and dendritic processes, which appear to be morphologically relatively more stable. To compare the cytoplasmic distributions and dynamics of microfilaments and microtubules we made time-lapse recordings of actin or the microtubuleassociated protein 2 tagged with green fluorescent protein in neurons growing in dispersed culture or in tissue slices from transgenic mice. The results complement existing evidence indicating that the high concentrations of actin present in dendritic spines is a specialization for morphological plasticity. By contrast, microtubule-associated protein 2 is limited to the shafts of dendrites where time-lapse recordings show little evidence for dynamic activity. A parallel exists between the partitioning of microfilaments and microtubules in motile and stable domains of growing processes during development and between dendrite shafts and spines at excitatory synapses in established neuronal circuits. These data thus suggest a mechanism, conserved through development and adulthood, in which the differential dynamics of actin and microtubules determine the plasticity of neuronal structures.

The stability of neuronal networks is thought to depend on synaptic transmission which provides activity-dependent maintenance signals for both synapses and neurons. Here, we tested the relationship between presynaptic secretion and neuronal maintenance using munc18-1-null mutant mice as a model. These mutants have a specific defect in secretion from synaptic and large dense-cored vesicles [Verhage et al. (2000), Science, 287, 864-869; Voets et al. (2001), Neuron, 31, 581-591]. Neuronal networks in these mutants develop normally up to synapse formation but eventually degenerate. The proposed relationship between secretion and neuronal maintenance was tested in low-density and organotypic cultures and, in vivo, by conditional cell-specific inactivation of the munc18-1 gene. Dissociated munc18-1-deficient neurons died within 4 days in vitro (DIV). Application of trophic factors, insulin or BDNF delayed degeneration up to 7 DIV. In organotypic cultures, munc18-1-deficient neurons survived until 9 DIV. On glial feeders, these neurons survived up to 10 DIV and 14 DIV when insulin was applied. Co-culturing dissociated mutant neurons with wild-type neurons did not prolong survival beyond 4 DIV, but coculturing mutant slices with wild-type slices prolonged survival up to 19 DIV. Cell-specific deletion of munc18-1 expression in cerebellar Purkinje cells in vivo resulted in the specific loss of these neurons without affecting connected or surrounding neurons. Together, these data allow three conclusions. First, the lack of synaptic activity cannot explain the degeneration in munc18-1-null mutants. Second, trophic support delays but cannot prevent degeneration. Third, a cell-intrinsic yet unknown function of munc18-1 is essential for prolonged survival.

The reproducibility crisis is a multifaceted problem involving ingrained practices within the scientific community. Fortunately, some causes are addressed by the author's adherence to rigor and reproducibility criteria, implemented via checklists at various journals. We developed an automated tool (SciScore) that evaluates research articles based on their adherence to key rigor criteria, including NIH criteria and RRIDs, at an unprecedented scale. We show that despite steady improvements, less than half of the scoring criteria, such as blinding or power analysis, are routinely addressed by authors; digging deeper, we examined the influence of specific checklists on average scores. The average score for a journal in a given year was named the Rigor and Transparency Index (RTI), a new journal quality metric. We compared the RTI with the Journal Impact Factor and found there was no correlation. The RTI can potentially serve as a proxy for methodological quality.

No abstract