<p>This thesis presents the results of a case study of academic audit as enacted at a typical New Zealand university between 1994 and 2019. Academic audit is a quality assurance methodology that drew originally from financial auditing and was adopted first in the United Kingdom, then in New Zealand and other jurisdictions in the early 1990s. New Zealand is unusual in having continued with academic audit without interruption and affords a unique research subject. Like the other New Zealand universities, the case study institution has undergone five audit cycles. If quality assurance is to demonstrably improve institutional activities, recommendations made by academic audit need to be implemented. At the case study institution, the phenomenon of recurrent recommendations was detected and three sets of complex recurrent recommendations were inspected in detail in an attempt to understand engagement by the university and by the quality agency with academic audit over time. The five Blanco-Ramírez and Berger (2014) quality dimensions were used as an analytical device to interpret the three focus areas: closing the student feedback loop; the monitoring of PhD students’ progress and how feedback from PhD students should be sought; and the ‘quality assurance infrastructure’ and leadership of quality at the university. Among the conclusions of the study were that the collegial dimension of quality is not necessarily benign; that a longitudinal dimension of quality provides a useful additional perspective; that dysfunction exists on the part of both auditor and auditee; and that engagement with audit recommendations was more likely in the context of other systemic factors. The thesis concludes with suggestions for the agency and the case-study institution.</p>