OBJECTIVEThis study investigated the benefit of prophylactic vertebroplasty of the adjacent vertebrae in single-segment osteoporotic vertebral body fractures treated with kyphoplasty.METHODSAll patients treated with kyphoplasty for osteoporotic single-segment fractures between January 2007 and August 2012 were included in this retrospective study. The patients received either kyphoplasty alone (kyphoplasty group) or kyphoplasty with additional vertebroplasty of the adjacent segment (vertebroplasty group). The segmental kyphosis with the rate of adjacent-segment fractures (ASFs) and remote fractures were studied on plain lateral radiographs preoperatively, postoperatively, at 3 months, and at final follow-up.RESULTSThirty-seven (82%) of a possible 45 patients were included for the analysis, with a mean follow-up of 16 months (range 3–54 months). The study population included 31 women, and the mean age of the total patient population was 72 years old (range 53–86 years). In 21 patients (57%), the fracture was in the thoracolumbar junction. Eighteen patients were treated with additional vertebroplasty and 19 with kyphoplasty only. The segmental kyphosis increased in both groups at final follow-up. A fracture through the primary treated vertebra (kyphoplasty) was found in 4 (22%) of the vertebroplasty group and in 3 (16%) of the kyphoplasty group (p = 0.6). An ASF was found in 50% (n = 9) of the vertebroplasty group and in 16% (n = 3) of the kyphoplasty group (p = 0.03). Remote fractures occurred in 1 patient in each group (p = 1.0).CONCLUSIONSProphylactic vertebroplasty of the adjacent vertebra in patients with single-segment osteoporotic fractures as performed in this study did not decrease the rate of adjacent fractures. Based on these retrospective data, the possible benefits of prophylactic vertebroplasty do not compensate for the possible risks of an additional cement augmentation.
Background: Sagittal spinopelvic parameters remain poorly defined in patients with Scheuermann disease (SD). For example, although pelvic incidence (PI) should approximate lumbar lordosis (LL) by 108, this is not true in patients with SD. This retrospective radiographic study was conducted to propose a new mathematical relationship between sagittal spinopelvic parameters in skeletally mature patients with SD. Methods: The following formula (D) was proposed [(thoracic kyphosis-458) þ (thoracolumbar kyphosis-08) þ (PI-LL) ¼ 6 108] and validated with standard spino pelvic parameters in patients with skeletally mature SD without prior spine surgery at 2 centers between 2006 and 2015. The T1 pelvic angle (TPA) was used as a measure of global balance with normal maximum of 158. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare D between balanced (TPA 158) and unbalanced (TPA. 158) patients with SD. Results: In patients with SD (n ¼ 30), half were female (n ¼ 15), the average age was 39 years, and the average D was 2.48. A significant correlation was discovered between D and both TPA (R 2 ¼ 0.75) and PI (R 2 ¼ 0.69). At TPA of 158, average D was 9.28. There was also a significant difference between balanced and unbalanced patients (À8.78 6 11.68 versus 28.28 6 19.78, P ¼ .0003). Conclusions: This study of a new formula (D) to evaluate global sagittal balance in patients with SD found that accounting for the kyphosis maintained D within 6 108. Further study is planned to determine whether maintaining and/or restoring a normal D is associated with improved outcomes in patients with SD after surgery.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.