GOALS To determine the role of NSAIDs in activation of IBD. BACKGROUND Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may activate inflammatory pathways in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). STUDY Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of American (CCFA) Partners is an ongoing cohort study of patients living with IBD. All data are self-reported via the internet. We identified a sub-cohort of participants whose disease activity, based on short Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (sCDAI) and simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI), indicated remission. Pattern of use of NSAIDs was measured at baseline, and disease activity assessment was performed 6 months later. We used multivariate binomial regression to determine effects of NSAIDs on disease activity. RESULTS A total of 791 individuals in remission had baseline and follow data available for analysis. Of these, 247 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients (43.2%) and 89 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients (40.6%) reported NSAID use. CD patients with NSAID use ≥ 5 times/monthly had greater risk of active disease at follow-up (23% v. 15%, p=0.04); (adjusted risk ratio (RR) 1.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–2.44). No effect was observed in patients with UC (22% vs 21%, p=0.98; adjusted RR 1.25; 95% CI, 0.81–1.92). Acetaminophen use was associated with active disease at follow-up in CD (adjusted RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.11–2.68). CONCLUSIONS Regular (≥ 5 times/monthly) NSAID and acetaminophen use were associated with active CD, but not UC. Less frequent NSAID use was not associated with active CD or UC. These findings indicate that regular NSAID use may increase CD activity, or that NSAID use may be a marker of a less robust remission; thus reflecting subclinical disease activity.

BackgroundThe Internet has successfully been used for patient-oriented survey research. Internet-based translational research may also be possible.ObjectiveOur aim was to study the feasibility of collecting biospecimens from CCFA Partners, an Internet-based inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cohort.MethodsFrom August 20, 2013, to January 4, 2014, we randomly sampled 412 participants, plus 179 from a prior validation study, and invited them to contribute a biospecimen. Participants were randomized to type (blood, saliva), incentive (none, US $20, or US $50), and collection method for blood. The first 82 contributors were also invited to contribute stool. We used descriptive statistics and t tests for comparisons.ResultsOf the 591 participants, 239 (40.4%) indicated interest and 171 (28.9%) contributed a biospecimen. Validation study participants were more likely to contribute than randomly selected participants (44% versus 23%, P<.001). The return rate for saliva was higher than blood collected by mobile phlebotomist and at doctors’ offices (38%, 31%, and 17% respectively, P<.001). For saliva, incentives were associated with higher return rates (43-44% versus 26%, P=.04); 61% contributed stool. Fourteen IBD-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped, and risk allele frequencies were comparable to other large IBD populations. Bacterial DNA was successfully extracted from stool samples and was of sufficient quality to permit quantitative polymerase chain reaction for total bacteria.ConclusionsParticipants are willing to contribute and it is feasible to collect biospecimens from an Internet-based IBD cohort. Home saliva kits yielded the highest return rate, though mobile phlebotomy was also effective. All samples were sufficient for genetic testing. These data support the feasibility of developing a centralized collection of biospecimens from this cohort to facilitate IBD translational studies.